Quote (brainpower777 @ Tue, Aug 11 2009, 03:36pm)
get the fuck out with 200k damage with negative resistance hypothetical problem just to match your stupid affirmation , please solve the real problem , kk ???
62@ RES = 62/100 damage reduced. therefore 62% Damage reduction right?
75@ RES = 75/100 damage reduced. therefore 75% damage reduction right?
therefore, what has +13 @ Res given you ??
you dont seem to understand the simple linear pattern here
Initial Damage---> Damage reduction ---> Life Lost
Damage reduction (from storm etc)
or @ RES
this affects STEP 2!! NOT STEP 3
therefore if you add +8 DR Ber, or +8@ RES, it gives you +8% DAMAGE REDUCTION (as proven above....)
what you + baboun were arguing is about % of LIFE LOST
and YES. +13 DR has decreased your LIFE LOST from 38-25 by (38-25)/38 x100 = 34% or so
but thats DECREASED LIFE LOSS
the DAMAGE REDUCTION did not change
is that hard to understand?? DECREASED LIFE LOSS IS NOT THE SAME AS DAMAGE REDUCTION
if you are too stupid to understand this, ill give up
@ Baboun
@ Res damage reduction is capped at 75, what is the point of your question?
i ask you, how does your theory seem to apply to @ RES = Elemental damage reduction, and yet you still cant explain why Stornm = +35% DR, even if you have 0 or 50 DR base...
back to the Circlet question
you seemed to dodge the fact that you think 76 Cold res <29 dex
how can you call your ama a TVT build if you ignore one of the major duelling classes - Blizz Soso's...