i can't blindly trust that you're familiar with 100% of all gm rulesets, pvp scenes/niches, scenarios, team matchups, character configurations.

good for u

i mean, i get it--we see a ring, we analyze it in terms of what it can do for the chars we play in the scenarios we're familiar with

some characters have either an abundance of mana or their mana cost is low enough that it makes sense to prioritize a point's worth of poison res over mana, and some characters benefit nothing from attack rating

the burden of proof is on the naysayers at this point

ok

no, poison res obviously isn't a useless mod.

but 28 pr won't have nearly the same effect on the outcome of a duel as ar or mana would.

weird stat combo, cool ring, no trophy / 10

"but 28 pr won't have nearly the same effect on the outcome of a duel as ar or mana would"

mmm i'm willing to agree that mana is generally stronger, more valuable than poison res in most matchups we're familiar with

Decent ring however unfortunately this isn’t the ‘decent ring room’ it’s the ‘trophy room’ & this isn’t a trophy.

it's a niche ring with exceptionally high, near-perf rolls

nice but no trophy

is it my favorite ring i own? nahh, but it'll be a while before we see another one with these affixes on jsp with rolls as high as these.

we all have our subjective criteria for trophies. i respect that.

my lv30 zon *must* have 60-90 mana on each of her rare rings, and she gets around 55 from her ammy. circ is a work in progress

my 99 zvz, though... i'm avoiding mana prefixes like the plague. she always has an abundance of mana/pots in her belt, and that's with a column dedicated to tp scrolls (12 slots for pots)

this would be my dream zon ring. it doesn't exist afaik. it'd be in a rotation with a dozen+ other rings. for me, part of the fun of d2 is experimenting with various gear concepts--some of which may have been known for decades, others utterly novel