don't be so full of yourself very few people were actually talking about your items. rather, most everyone is talking about how lame of a troll you are.

no ratings on this page either. deal with it.

I've triggered over 110 pages of discussion in three weeks.

Jealous?

but that's a pointless metric. you could be spamming your own threads with replies to each post, like what you're doing now, but that doesn't mean that the content is actually worthy of something to be proud of.

bones187 has elicited thousands of pages of discussion...but you don't see him bragging about it. him slamming Trap@jsp into oblivion however...that's something worth mentioning. just like how i got spitflame, fartymcdonalds, and orangutan banned in one fell swoop.

My items are real and the threads created for them have totaled over 110 pages in three weeks. These threads have gotten multiple people suspended and warned.

You're most known for losing thousands and thousand of fg to someone with a more refined intellect. Deal with it.

you've failed because they all have multis right now

you think it's ez to ban a multi?

then you have failed @ your job.

such a refined intellect that they were able to prevent themselves from betting banned with fg outstanding on their accounts.

oh wait.



for practically 2010 spawns to dispose of a 5 year old account...that's a huge deal. sure they can come back, but it'll be with a chip on their shoulder. posting for them will never be the same.

trap was less than a month away from being a 2009 account
fattymcfatpants was a 2010 account
spitfire87 was a 2010 account
foundnature was a 2010 account

Yeah, really looks like you accomplished a lot. Sure does make up for losing over 40,000 fg.

Not to mention iffy1 claims to be behind two of those bannings.

This post was edited by DrakeMillers on Dec 6 2010 11:39pm

well, tbh here i must vouch u bro, because this kid is absoultely mad about pixels and the fact no one around gives a shit about that circlet and keep spamming this shitty thread

what items bro?



it's actually 2 circlets, but he doesn't own neither. they don't even exist hence the 100+ pages of doge


inb4 mediator vouched without having seen it because four of your multis are considered solid enough evidence to keep a thread goin / 10

he never really vouched it; he summarized that due to the amoutn of people that had claimed to see it, it must exist. he could have done this by checking ips or other circumstances, after all he's a mediator. you gotta think before acting