Quote (Leevee @ Jun 16 2017 02:36pm)
I think it's more about the fact that, in many cases, those CEOs are the bosses of people who can barely make ends meet with their wage. The CEO's high wage implies that the company has enough money to pay its employees properly but chooses not to do so.
I'm getting a company-wide bonus (partly based on revenue) this year, and I have to say I like it a lot. When things go well, no matter how you look at it, it's everyone in the company that made it happen.
Yeah but having a really good CEO is the difference between you having a successful company that can pay you or one that will fire you because they have to downsize because their low paid CEO is a dope.
Howard Schultz is the easiest example. He got paid a ton, left in 2000 and they paid their next CEO lower, and Starbucks absolutely tanked because he didn't understand his company the way Schultz did. That is not good for the staff either. Then Schultz came back, got paid a ton, and everyone won.
That's why I don't like whining at CEO pay