Nope. I've done this argument before and you proved yourself impervious to reason and supported Molyneux's assessment that most of America wants you and him shot.

In the face of such utter insanity I choose not to become embroiled in it a second time. Simple.

Call it cowardice if you want, if that helps you reconcile it. I couldn't give a shit. You're utterly irrational when it comes to Molyneux and I cba to argue the toss with you.

And it's my bedtime. Goodnight, sleep tight and rest easy in the knowledge that I can simultaneously disagree with you and not think you should be shot.

This sounds like another extreme misrepresentation of what was said, stripped from all context, used to score points by painting the other guy as strange and unreasonable without actually showing it or making an intellectual point.

Taking issue with some of the things he said is legitimate. Hes said a lot of shit in his prolific career, and there is plenty of room for valid disagreement and differing points of views, nor is he perfect.
Rather than "I disagree with him on point x and point y and here is why", or even "i disagree with him here and don't want to talk about it, but he might not be wrong or evil here" you call him a cult leader and associate him with a serial killer(despite him being radically pro-peace and non-aggression), and try to use some cherry picked and misrepresented points you didn't like the sound of(and didnt understand) as a reason to dismiss everything he says and deflect from your own highly visible errors and false accusations.
Its the trademark of a shitty anti-intellectual human being.

Your tactics here are ironically a case study in the non-argument.
I'm running low on adjectives to describe the immaturity and despicable nature of your method.
You couldn't defend your assertion so your keep running your mouth with appeals to emotion and ad hom degeneracy.

"arianna huff is unattractive both inside and out. I fully understand why her former husband left her for a man- he made a good decision."

-Donald Trump (2012)

nice hitjobs

wake me up when the hyperinflation hits, ron paul swears it's any day now...

Its true and he's right.

Before the welfare state, this bullshit didn't happen.

And single moms are delusional parents after the fact too. Statistics show they beat their kids like punching bags. And I don't blame him for being irate.

His mother dragged Stefan's father through a terrible divorce at a really young age and delusionally blamed "men" the rest of her life as is socially acceptable.



Housing prices are shooting up quite nicely.

Not an argument for hyperinflation

On-topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_watch_me

Is the argument about that one wanna-be philosopher and long-time cult leader?

This post was edited by Gastly on Jul 11 2016 03:55pm

Bald guy with weird accent who makes YouTube videos purporting himself to be a libertarian, yet strangely loves trump (in contrast to libertarian ideals). Another Alex Jones

This post was edited by dro94 on Jul 12 2016 01:47am

He is bad but his wife giving ideological medical advice and being reprimanded by the board of psychogists is beyond the pale.

Molyneux is a histrionic dude with no professional credientials tobspeak of and nobody would hear about If it wasn't for the platform of YouTube. Plus the "you want me shot" thing is hilarious. I bet his parents didn't spank. But his wife has credientials and should know better than to espouse his made up stuff about deFOOing etc to join his cult. She never used that in her private practice though. She turned ethics on for her practice, and turned them off for her husband's radio show. This is very funny to me being in that same line of work.

This post was edited by Skinned on Jul 12 2016 06:13am

The ultimate refuge of any political argument is in the use of force.

Just say yes and be done with it.

These are irreconcilable differences, I support the use of violence in pursuit of an orderly and structured society. Molyneux is mistaken if he believes that wealth and prosperity are possible without it.