Quote (WidowMaKer_MK @ Apr 20 2016 08:56am)
...not only prohibitively expensive and incredibly dangerous but it fails to account for the actual amount of waste we have stored up .
Prohibitively expensive as a business venture sure, as a combined effort of the World's biggest players? I think less so.
Incredibly dangerous? Of course, as is storing nuclear waste on our planet. But as the waste isn't really going anywhere there isn't a deadline. And it wouldn't be actually built unless the engineering worked out in far less expensive simulations and tests on scale.
We have to find a way to get rid of this shit, pour 50 ft of concrete on top of it, launch it to space, whatever.
This whole topic has me wondering though, adjusted for inflation how much less expensive is space travel today than in the Rocket boom during the cold war? Is it really THAT expensive to create a rocket that has a 1 way trip? I would imagine a big part of the expense in a space shuttle is the need for it to survive reentry and land without murdering the crew. Which is entirely unneeded in this application.
This post was edited by thesnipa on Apr 20 2016 09:11am