Quote (Skinned @ Feb 1 2016 09:55am)
Attacking the $.77 per $1 as an attack on the idea of a wage gap is about as hyperbolic as claiming women make $.77 on $1 as evidence of a wage gap.
Nobody is talking about the world as it is, everybody is fixated on a generic aggregate political term.
And it is the internet, there are billion different products for every bias, satanic goat fuckers can find a dozen links espousing the psychological and physiological benefits of satanic goat fucking if they look for awhile or make some.
Don't I see you attacking the MSM a lot? Why cite their articles as evidence?
https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/WomenLeadership.pdfReal numbers:
Here is the real picture of what is going on. If you are a women, you won't be boss, because of what isn't hanging between your legs. Unless you're HRC.
I love the cute little manipulative info-graphic pieces internet users make nowadays. Way sexier than the research and measurement. :thumbsup:
One just cant win with you in terms of debunking feminist tropes as my 95 FOCKING pages of both govt sources and MSM varied sources show. Yeah I do rally against the MSM, but this is a catch 22 here. If I post something from what one might consider a third party source it's discounted because, Who the hells knows those guys!, If I post something from the MSM, its LOL MSM!. You are correct about confirmation bias, however that doesnt address whether the arguments being made are valid or not.
I want opportunity of access , not outcome. You get what you put in. Men as a generality are willing to put in longer hours, take more risk, start more business and the like, so of course there is more Male Bosses.
It's perfectly reasonable for their to be a wage gap in gross numbers, not in terms of men vs women in the exact same scenario. In the Western world women (not all, but enough to skew aggregate gross wages between sexes) have the option of having a more balanced life choosing professions that are gratifying but not necessarily high paying compared to some fields , having the luxury of working part time and staying home with the kids (as is ideal). Flexible hours and part time rank much higher in surveys for women than men. The "cute" graphic tells this point and the ~100 articles, university studies, MSM, and govt info shows this which is why I included it.
basically, you discounted the overwhelming amount of evidence that basically all real economist agree with in terms of the wage gap.
You teased about an infographic without addressing its points
You attacked the 100 ish mixed sources, but not the content.
You made an emotional appeal about men vs women as bosses.
I defy you to watch this fairly short video.