If you want to talk about facts lets do that. Please explain how this fact will result in the destruction that you claim is coming for Europe.

1/2 of Syria's population (which has been displaced by the war) is equal to about a .6% increase in Europe's population.

How exactly is the .6% going to have the detrimental impacts on Europe that you claim? Especially when we consider many would return to a stabilized Syria if that day comes.

as you obviously didn't read the article i'll quote it for you here.



now, according to Uppsala University quoting Brottsförebyggande rådet (The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention)
"Vid åtta av tio anmälda våldtäkter är förövaren bekant med offret. 32 procent av de polisanmälda våldtäkterna har enligt statistiken skett inom en nära relation"
in eight out of ten cases in reported rapes the rapist was previously known to the victim. according to the police's statistics 32 percent of rapes are committed by people in close relations.

this, combined with the changes in what defines as sexual assault and how repeated sexual assaults are put into statistics (which, as i told you are behind the clear spikes in the statistics. you are familiar with the trends there, aren't you?)
in most countries familial rape that continues for, say, a year all of the individual rapes aren't classified separately.


i asked you to familiarise yourself with the subject, which you did not. in fact it seems like you didn't even read the post to which you were replying to, which is an odd way to approach any discussion at all.


oh, but that's pretty much the only time i've heard about such claims being made by any news agency. i actually tried googling it a bit but i only found some neo-nazi and fringe-right websites. should i interpret what you're saying as something along the lines of "you Europeans who live in Europe and who have been to the places in question are in fact brain washed by the state / mass media!". i don't see how Neo-Nazi websites are any better than whatever this "mass media" that you think i follow is. why is it that they claim that the 7xx zus are "no-go zones" when that is quite clearly and demonstrably not the case?

you claimed that there are towns where Europeans and the police don't go. now it's time for you to name them. Den Haag wasn't under Sharia, neither was Lyons, nor was Birmingham, nor was Amsterdam nor Berlin nor Munchen nor Bonn nor... where are these towns? sure, there's loads of crime that correlates with poverty in, say, Malmö, but the times i've been either there or in Stockholm i've never once met anything at all that even faintly resembles a shariah zone. have you some better sources on the subject?


actually the birth rates drop already by second generation and "generation 1.5". there have been actual studies about this y'know, and the effect is pretty well known - the drop's especially strong with improving education and jobs, but it's still there even when there isn't that much of a massive change in socio-economical status (at least in Germany - in Sweden the rates are unchanged if education and employment don't improve). why have you not familiarised yourself with them before making your claims? or have you got some other sources than German / Swedish figures/research? the French ones won't help, but if you've got statistics on how the birth rates have developed beween generational changes in British immigrants i'd be more than interested to hear about them.

0/10 thread & 0/10 posts, 100% d2jsp quality up here.

This post was edited by Gastly on Sep 21 2015 03:18pm

I didnt bother reading the article because I dont have time to waste reading articles in this moment. If you want to make a point, this is what the post option is about. Make a point with your own words or make a quick review about what the article is talking about. I dont have an obligation nor is my job to read an article nor do I care if you listen to what I say or not. I speak what I have read/seen/studied/told by close people, and I make the comparison to what has happened here in my country. I explained it with my own words, if you want to say Sweden's rape rate has not increased because of technicalities or some other BS, if you want to say undesired uneducated immigration has improved Sweden, then go ahead, I'm not stopping you. I dont care about Sweden, is not my country, I'm just pointing out the fact how weak and "ball-less" they have become for the reasons I already explained. You made your point trying to minimize or hide the increasing raping in Sweden, you made your point saying Sweden has become a better place now, I made my point that is all the contrary. Period.




Nazi this nazi that nazi bleh bloh blah blah blah blah... sorry you lost me here.




There are thousands of towns in Europe, how can I know the names of these towns?. I havent researched the names of these towns because I dont care about Europe. So It is not my job to go search and make a thesis investigation about the places, names and statistics of the towns taken over (by imposing their law) by radical islam. It isnt my obligation to go search for names of cities of countries I give a shit about. I'm just warning about what I have seen in documentaries and what friends and families (in Europe) have told me. I believe them. Like me, they have seen the end result of undesired and uneducated immigration in our country, but they left the country, I stayed because I chose to stay, because this is my home as shitty as it is. They see the parallelism with what is happening there with what happened here. You dont see it because you are naive and you havent experienced it. Thats why I said in another topic that for naive people like you (naive because of years and years of brainwashing and mind conditioning), it takes 20 or 30 more years to realize the truth, when the reality of what you were warned decades ago hits your face hard, and when that happens it will be too late.




Bullshit.




Bullshit again. Who makes these "studies"? people with ties with economic interests and corporations that need cheap labor/workforce (from the uneducated immigration). This is the core of everything, they need the cheap labor/workforce without giving a shit about how they are destroying their countries. Of course they are going to lie and bring "studies" made by who the fuck knows, with the purpose of promoting their agenda, so people brainwashed like you eat it all completely, thinking you are bringing refugees for humanitarian and good reasons "oh supreme defender of the weak and poor, all hail you", yeah right. They are using the middle east chaos to bring soon-to-be cheap labor/workforce (and people who will eventually give them political support in some cases), and claim is all for humanitarian reasons. Funny thing is that thousands of those "refugees" are from countries with no wars at all lol.

Try to fool your fellow brainwashed europeans with this trash. You wont fool anyone elsewhere.

This post was edited by Golden_Order on Sep 21 2015 04:03pm

Gastly, I want you to answer me the following questions with a "YES" or "NOT".

1) Have raping rates increased in Sweden with the entrance of uneducated/undesired immigrants? YES or NOT
2) Is it safe to walk (especially young girls) in Sweden near neighborhoods filled with these uneducated/undesired immigrants? YES or NOT
3) Have life conditions improved in Sweden since the massive uneducated/undesired immigration started? YES or NOT

Can you answer them with a YES or NOT?, please no need for "nazi this nazi that" blabbering and no articles BS here. Just YES or NOT.

This post was edited by Golden_Order on Sep 21 2015 04:20pm

You and your questions aren't worth the time, You don't read other people's views yet you write walls of fucking text expecting people to waste their time on your bigoted hate filled lies and misconceptions? GTFO rando

Enough said.

Three simple questions whose answers can be "YES" or "NOT. Instead of answering with YES or NOT, this man decides to insult the person making the fair easy questions, then proceeds to "throw me out of my own topic" with the words "GTFO rando", all of this because the truth is too hard to grasp. Nice.

By the way:



Oh yes I do, and I respect them. I just told him that I didnt read the article he linked me to, I did however replied to his and everyone else's posts, as long as they write them with their own words. Like I said before, write with your own words your own points of views, dont lead me to articles written by who knows who with what intentions following who knows what agenda. Defend your point of view with your own words, its that simple.

No need for insults. The insulting just shows you dont have anything else to reply, because the truth is too hard to grasp and admit I guess.

This post was edited by Golden_Order on Sep 21 2015 05:11pm

It's your continued hate filled bigoted rants like the ones up above that make you very insultable

Or how about I don't accept a random prediction from someone who clearly is very against helping refugees?
Especially when they already produced false information about my country...

He actually made some good points, which you expressly stated you would not read.

Why would he reply to you any further?