I see no reason why it should be illegal when it's consensual.

This post was edited by Voyaging on Jul 12 2014 06:58pm

The slipper slope is real. Leftism has been completely discredited.

Nothing should be illegal without a compelling reason. If people in a position of authority abuse that power to force sex against someone elses will, that is rape, which is nonconsensual. And incest and rape are two different things. Incestuous rape should be illegal as rape.

and who tells you that the nutcase judge mentioned (who is already suspended) is a leftist?

/ps

just look at the bible based cult 'family of love' and it's sexual practices

This post was edited by brmv on Jul 12 2014 07:59pm

Just because it's illegal or legal doesn't mean it's right

i agree with that too, and i am pretty sure it is better just not doing it.

But the thread happen to a question about the law, and there is no reason to make it illegal

Incest is extremely common in nature. Banning it is banning nature.

It's in human nature to ban nature, thinking that we are over it

...blanket justification for every evil and perversion under the sun .

Infanticide is extremely common in nature, doesn't make it right.
The law should serve what is right and what is wrong, it should not abide any warped views of naturalists or social darwinists or scalia-esque textualism nor originalism.