Quote (Handcuffs @ Apr 25 2024 03:25pm)
I understand your question as pertaining largely to the phenomenon of what is to happen after a population's location or border is changed by force, especially as subsequent generations build into the future. It is a reality of history that people have gone to war, used violence, or otherwise ethnically cleansed regions resulting in serious geopolitical changes as a result of human displacement. What happens next, broadly speaking, is that either the new borders stabilize along the new lines and life continues and things move towards acceptance and peace, the aggrieved instead continue to seek to take back their land by force (Hamas' goal), or the aggressor continues to take more and more land until a region is sufficiently conquered (Settlers).
Unfortunately, while some are striving for option 1 in some fashion, both 2 and 3 are simultaneously true and remain part of the tapestry that is the complex barrier to peace.
I don't see how #1 is possible with the current division between the populations. The populations would need to integrate to achieve understanding, agreement, peace. Instead there are a plethora of reasons they are extremely divided and divide growing. Perhaps #1 is irreconcilable given the makeup of the governments having aspects of religious or nepotism coupled to decision making along with blood history.
The opposite of a melting pot analogy. Water and Sodium