d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2024
Prev1211212213
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 51,284
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,400.67
Apr 25 2024 02:41pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ 25 Apr 2024 15:56)
I think you lost the sense of the full discussion. I think we both agree about the nature of both events.

If the Trump electors had defected, Biden would have been gifted a landslide victory in 2024. Trump wouldn't be able to run on the "they're all out to get me" tagline anymore. It's a good thing that the election wasn't swayed by disloyal delegates back then.

Oh, I absolutely agree with you on disloyal delegates. My point is just that Jackson could campaign, and win, based on a legitimate gripe while Trump's complaints about the stolen election are mostly baseless and it was actually him who tried to incentivize electors to defect.

Quote (Landmine @ 25 Apr 2024 15:52)
Evidence. 50 intelligence officials signing on to laptop Russia information knowing it to be untrue. Which was enough to sway the election.

I really doubt it. Trump would have needed a uniform national swing of 0.63% to barely eke out a contested win via a 269-269 EC tie and a narrow win in the contingent election in the House; he would have needed a swing of 1.16% for an outright win.

You gotta keep in mind that some 85-90% of the electorate consists of partisans with staunch political leanings, people whose vote is not up for grabs under any realistic circumstances. Surely not for a story as obscure as Hunter's Laptop. And Biden won at least half of those swing voters. So realistically, the Hunter Biden laptop story would have needed to convince something like 1 in 6 of the swing voters who ultimately went with Biden to switch over to Trump. I just don't see it. Hunter was not the candidate, his fuckups only reflect extremely marginally on his father. Things would be different if the Hunter laptop stuff had produced tangible evidence for direct corruption by Joe, but it didn't.

This is different from the Clinton email investigation at the end of the 2016 cycle. The allegation in that case was directly related to the candidate Hillary, and it reinforced long-standing negative perceptions about her shadiness and ruthlessness. Biden didn't have nearly as bad a reputation, so I just don't see how an investigation into his son would have poisoned public perception of him to the degree necessary for flipping the election.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Apr 25 2024 02:42pm
Member
Posts: 104,178
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,655.00
Apr 25 2024 04:15pm




US Supreme Court justices in Trump case lean toward some level of immunity

https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-weighs-trumps-bid-immunity-prosecution-2024-04-25/

This post was edited by Ghot on Apr 25 2024 04:18pm
Member
Posts: 51,284
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,400.67
Apr 25 2024 07:23pm
Quote (Ghot @ 26 Apr 2024 00:15)


Quote
The Supreme Court's conservative justices signaled support on Thursday for U.S. presidents having some level of protection from criminal charges for certain acts taken in office

A lot will hinge on the concrete details of the ruling.

Quote
most of the justices seemed unlikely to embrace Trump's most far-reaching argument that presidents have "absolute immunity"
[...]
But the conservative justices [...] indicated concern about presidents lacking any degree of immunity, especially for less egregious acts. The contours of such a ruling, though, were not clear after arguments probing the extent of presidential powers.

Time will tell if this really turns into a win for Trump.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Apr 25 2024 07:23pm
Member
Posts: 23,679
Joined: Nov 13 2008
Gold: 1,253.69
Apr 25 2024 07:52pm
oh no tears please....

its A WASTE OF GOOD SUFFERING!



This post was edited by caswallen on Apr 25 2024 07:58pm
Member
Posts: 104,178
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,655.00
Apr 25 2024 09:32pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Apr 25 2024 09:23pm)
A lot will hinge on the concrete details of the ruling.
Time will tell if this really turns into a win for Trump.



I get the feeling that it's gonna be a win. I'd imagine the justices are just vacillating for the optics.
Touchy subject.

Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1211212213
Add Reply New Topic New Poll