d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Science, Technology & Nature > Nasa Live Press-conference Feb22
Prev13456728Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 4650Replies: 278Track Topic
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
#41
Feb 24 2017 05:56pm
Quote (Santara @ Feb 24 2017 11:49am)
Nah, posting from the phone isn't really conducive to such posts. Here you go cupcake. See anything on the edges to indicate the light could possibly be focused? I don't.

https://www.nsf.gov/news/mmg/media/images/sun_sound1_h.jpg

Now, if you want to talk about dodging, that is exactly what you did with the rest of my post.


More Fail, I said a picture from earth showing all sides of the sun - that's a cgi painting from Nasa Geosynchronous Satel-Toon", look at the perspective of that it , look at the stars around it - you really think the exposure for the sun would be anywhere near that of a star?

that's pretty but fake as hell.

And before we get to Newton can you explain why you believe The Big Bang Theory when it violates the Law of Entropy and how can you believe in The entire Theory of Evolution when it claims we can from goo and violates the law of biogenesis?
Member
Posts: 23,679
Joined: Nov 13 2008
Gold: 1,253.69
#42
Feb 24 2017 09:26pm
Quote (Santara @ Feb 24 2017 03:49pm)
Nah, posting from the phone isn't really conducive to such posts. Here you go cupcake. See anything on the edges to indicate the light could possibly be focused? I don't.

https://www.nsf.gov/news/mmg/media/images/sun_sound1_h.jpg

Now, if you want to talk about dodging, that is exactly what you did with the rest of my post.


omg pwned, card just got pwned, bahahahhaha
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
#43
Feb 24 2017 10:02pm
Quote (caswallen @ Feb 24 2017 05:26pm)
omg pwned, card just got pwned, bahahahhaha


I only see confirm atheist's saying "pawned" but it not even remotely true.

Like no one being able to explain crepuscular sun rays without invoking a failed understanding of perspective.

Member
Posts: 42,396
Joined: Oct 23 2007
Gold: 2,848.72
Warn: 70%
#44
Feb 24 2017 10:24pm
inb4proof
Member
Posts: 23,679
Joined: Nov 13 2008
Gold: 1,253.69
#45
Feb 25 2017 01:12am
Quote (card_sultan @ Feb 24 2017 10:02pm)
I only see confirm atheist's saying "pawned" but it not even remotely true.

Like no one being able to explain crepuscular sun rays without invoking a failed understanding of perspective.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=760y9sEkC98


pwnt
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
#46
Feb 25 2017 01:50am
Quote (caswallen @ Feb 24 2017 09:12pm)
pwnt


explain crepuscular rays with actual perspective - then pwnt will have worth - till then it is just empty pathetic rhetoric from wind bags.

oh wait, aren't you a gc regular?

You're in the wrong section.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Feb 25 2017 01:54am
Member
Posts: 16,621
Joined: Jan 7 2017
Gold: 90.58
#47
Feb 25 2017 04:16am
Quote (card_sultan @ Feb 24 2017 03:56pm)
More Fail, I said a picture from earth showing all sides of the sun - that's a cgi painting from Nasa Geosynchronous Satel-Toon", look at the perspective of that it , look at the stars around it - you really think the exposure for the sun would be anywhere near that of a star?

that's pretty but fake as hell.

And before we get to Newton can you explain why you believe The Big Bang Theory when it violates the Law of Entropy and how can you believe in The entire Theory of Evolution when it claims we can from goo and violates the law of biogenesis?


CGI PAINTING

LOL
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
#48
Feb 25 2017 09:57am
Quote (JohnMiller92 @ Feb 25 2017 12:16am)
CGI PAINTING

LOL


Member
Posts: 51,928
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
#49
Feb 25 2017 03:10pm
Quote (tard_sultan @ Feb 24 2017 05:56pm)
More Fail, I said a picture from earth showing all sides of the sun - that's a cgi painting from Nasa Geosynchronous Satel-Toon", look at the perspective of that it , look at the stars around it - you really think the exposure for the sun would be anywhere near that of a star?

that's pretty but fake as hell.

And before we get to Newton can you explain why you believe The Big Bang Theory when it violates the Law of Entropy and how can you believe in The entire Theory of Evolution when it claims we can from goo and violates the law of biogenesis?


Nothing failed there except your ability to address the point. The picture was taken in the high ultraviolet spectrum, so the ability to get a few stars in the background isn't unreasonable.

Nope. Newton first. How does the sun change vector to follow your magical figure eight?
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
#50
Feb 25 2017 09:57pm
Quote (Santara @ Feb 25 2017 11:10am)
Nothing failed there except your ability to address the point. The picture was taken in the high ultraviolet spectrum, so the ability to get a few stars in the background isn't unreasonable.

Nope. Newton first. How does the sun change vector to follow your magical figure eight?


Yes it is unreasonable. Also the picture is made in B+W and the color is added and made into an animation - plus the sun doesn't actually spin - its just fake as hell.

Are Newton's Law the pinnacle of Physics and unbreakable?

Funny Nasa doesn't think so?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/11/22/this-rocket-engine-breaks-a-law-of-physics-but-a-nasa-test-says-it-works-anyway/?utm_term=.c489c24edd8d

Exactly which Newton Law is Magnetic fluctuation in violation of and how?

When will you stop dodging and answer a question? My guess is never.
Go Back To Science, Technology & Nature Topic List
Prev13456728Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2024 d2jsp  Contact