d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Attempted Murder Or Self Defemse?
Prev123458Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 33,580
Joined: May 9 2009
Gold: 3.33
May 22 2016 12:48pm
Whatever you call Grievous Bodily Harm in the states. It's a significant injury and there is the intent to cause physical harm.
Member
Posts: 14,554
Joined: Jan 4 2007
Gold: 109.01
May 22 2016 12:52pm
Quote (Santara @ May 22 2016 01:46pm)
$200 is a minor interest, I agree. Armed robbery is not, however. While I disagree with the driver's action for being less than the most rational course of action, I cannot say I fault him either. Being the victim of a felony kind of grants him some latitude. If it had been a cop in the driver's seat, would this scenario be any different on a legitimacy level?


Cop or civilian I view it in the same manner, a blue costume doesn't grant special rights or another moral compass to operate on. A cop would be compelled to remedy the situation, but after disengagement and walking away the officer is still not justified running the kid down in his car.I demand a higher standard of police then I do citizens.

Quote
People laud store clerks who use lethal force in defense during robberies, how is this that much different?"


During robberies there is a clear and present threat, after they walk out the door fleeing the crime scene, it's no longer that.

This post was edited by Master_Zappy on May 22 2016 12:57pm
Member
Posts: 60,893
Joined: Jan 24 2007
Gold: 171.76
May 22 2016 01:01pm
Quote (Santara @ May 22 2016 02:46pm)
$200 is a minor interest, I agree. Armed robbery is not, however. While I disagree with the driver's action for being less than the most rational course of action, I cannot say I fault him either. Being the victim of a felony kind of grants him some latitude. If it had been a cop in the driver's seat, would this scenario be any different on a legitimacy level?



People laud store clerks who use lethal force in defense during robberies, how is this that much different?


If a store clerk chased a guy down the street and cornered the robber and then shot him in the back i wouldnt laude him
Member
Posts: 51,928
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
May 22 2016 01:04pm
Quote (Master_Zappy @ May 22 2016 12:52pm)
Cop or civilian I view it in the same manner, a blue costume doesn't grant special rights or another moral compass to operate on. A cop would be compelled to remedy the situation, but after disengagement and walking away the officer is still not justified running the kid down in his car.I demand a higher standard of police then I do citizens.



During robberies there is a clear and present threat, after they walk out the door fleeing the crime scene, it's no longer that.


I even agree that a blue costume doesn't grant special rights, but most of the members of this forum do, but my question was more along the lines of what recourse does a person have. If a cop would have been in the right to remedy the situation, why isn't a citizen?
Member
Posts: 33,580
Joined: May 9 2009
Gold: 3.33
May 22 2016 01:11pm
Quote (Santara @ May 22 2016 08:04pm)
I even agree that a blue costume doesn't grant special rights, but most of the members of this forum do, but my question was more along the lines of what recourse does a person have. If a cop would have been in the right to remedy the situation, why isn't a citizen?


They aren't trained to remedy the situation to avoid unfavourable outcomes. Pretty obvious...
Member
Posts: 14,554
Joined: Jan 4 2007
Gold: 109.01
May 22 2016 01:16pm
Quote (Santara @ May 22 2016 02:04pm)
I even agree that a blue costume doesn't grant special rights, but most of the members of this forum do, but my question was more along the lines of what recourse does a person have. If a cop would have been in the right to remedy the situation, why isn't a citizen?


I'm not a police, nor play one on TV, but by remedy I'd expect the officer to exit his car while drawing his wep and keeping his car door as cover and loudly announce to the shoebandit to get down on the ground with his hands in the air. If the kid then went to pull his gun, lethal force is then justified. If he tried to flee, then he could attempt to follow, or just call for policing to find him via some detective stuff, like showing up at the kids house after tracking him down via the Craigslist or cameras.

As a citizen you don't have those options per say, and your right to self defense ends when you are no longer in harm's way.

This post was edited by Master_Zappy on May 22 2016 01:31pm
Member
Posts: 96,125
Joined: Mar 15 2007
Gold: 7,252.72
May 22 2016 01:16pm
...the follow up assault with a motor vehicle was uncalled for and even dangerous to others . I'm entertaining the idea that 5 years in prison should be the minimum .
Member
Posts: 48,563
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 5,016.77
May 22 2016 01:31pm
Quote (hATemOnkEy @ May 22 2016 01:44pm)
Could it be called excessive force during citizens arrest?


:thumbsup:
Member
Posts: 77,542
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 500.00
May 22 2016 01:47pm
Quote (dro94 @ May 22 2016 02:11pm)
They aren't trained to remedy the situation to avoid unfavourable outcomes. Pretty obvious...


to be fair even police aren't properly trained to remedy such situations, remember they did a drive by shooting on a 12 year old with a toy gun?
Member
Posts: 33,580
Joined: May 9 2009
Gold: 3.33
May 22 2016 01:49pm
Quote (duffman316 @ May 22 2016 08:47pm)
to be fair even police aren't properly trained to remedy such situations, remember they did a drive by shooting on a 12 year old with a toy gun?


Well they should be, that's your problem as a society. That culture is not present in other civilised countries
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev123458Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll