Quote (Master_Zappy @ May 22 2016 12:36pm)
Protecting minor interests with lethal force after the dangerous situation is over and the perp is leaving isn't justified in my eyes and reengaging then puts the driver and pedestrians back at risk.
$200 is a minor interest, I agree. Armed robbery is not, however. While I disagree with the driver's action for being less than the most rational course of action, I cannot say I fault him either. Being the victim of a felony kind of grants him some latitude. If it had been a cop in the driver's seat, would this scenario be any different on a legitimacy level?
Quote (bitg_pj @ May 22 2016 12:45pm)
He doesnt have a right to run someone over because he lost some money... sorry santara.
People laud store clerks who use lethal force in defense during robberies, how is this that much different?
This post was edited by Santara on May 22 2016 12:47pm