Quote (Neptunus @ May 21 2016 01:32pm)
Yes, because otherwise you can be a poor to mediocre quality health service provider from an overall medical perspective yet know how to kiss ass properly so the free market will ensure a continuous stream of patients customers lining up for poorer health care.
By my reckoning this is the opposite of what I'd expect. The market will weed out providers who do not add the level of quality or pricing on goods and services due to the existence of competition. The govt creating a quasi monopoly, captive audience and a layer of bureaucracy that would be more inclined to allow shoddy service to fly under the radar or operate in a sub par way because uncle Sam is footing the bill instead of consumers.
When people directly pay for goods and services they are more selective and results orientated.
One example of public vs private without applying the Hierarchical linear model.
Quote
Summary
In grades 4 and 8 for both reading and mathematics, students in private schools achieved at higher levels than students in public schools. The average difference in school means ranged from almost 8 points for grade 4 mathematics, to about 18 points for grade 8 reading. The average differences were all statistically significant
December 1999 - By a margin of nine to one, Americans believe parents should have the right to choose their child's school, according to a report released last month by Public Agenda, a research organization based in New York City. Moreover, if they were given a choice of schools-- along with the financial wherewithal to exercise it-- a full 55 percent of parents who currently send their children to public schools would want to send them to private schools.
This post was edited by Master_Zappy on May 21 2016 01:05pm