Lol. Let's all pretend without Western intervention the Middle East wouldn't be the most chaotic region in the world.

True, but most of the migrants aren't from Syria or Libya.

Wouldn't be nearly as bad. Deposing elected secular leaders and instituting religious radicals worked so well for Iran.

don't think that was ever mentioned on fox news so he wouldn't be aware of it

You have no reason to believe that, because it has never happened. The Middle East would be a shitshow if America wasn't involved.

It happened in 1953 because the old leader wouldn't sell us oil. We instituted a new leader who only stayed in power thanks to our support.

Google it...

You have no evidence that a lack of Western influence would be better, because it has never happened.

The Middle East continues to be chaotic with or without our intervention. The Obama experiment has failed.

Historical knowledge isn't a strong trait of conservatives. If it were there would be much fewer conservatives.

Because we have every reason to think that replacing peaceful elected leaders with radical war mongers totally promotes peace. Think about what you are saying dumbass.

If we pull out now it's not the same since destabilizing a region and leaving behind a power vacuum isn't a recipe for peace. The effects of our influence will be felt for hundreds of years

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Sep 26 2015 06:19pm