you put a good deal of thought into it and couldn't find any reason to say it's wrong?

lethal bullet injection in head ...

hmmh... they really should bring back gladiator fights

i would pay top dollar for this

I can list a lot of reasons other people say it's wrong, but I don't think it's wrong for any of those reasons.

this is a poll you don't have to supply a reason

there is shit that has affected the way I view certain questions, that I have definite yes or no feelings on but I couldn't voice just one or two things that made me think that way.

sometimes it's just how life has played out

i can think of many reasons to support and oppose it but the one reason i have no counter argument to is the risk of accidentally sending an innocent man to death

i support the concept of the death penalty but i'm opposed to implementing it because of this

If there is zero doubt about guilt I can sorta support it but it still leaves a bitter taste in my mouth, like we're not civilised enough as society yet to do away with this type of punishment. I feel similar about torture.

If it's an offense proven beyond absolute doubt, then yes, i.e. caught on camera with DNA evidence, witnesses and zero doubt of false identification, AKA caught red-handed.

If it's proven beyond reasonable doubt (enough to get a conviction), then no, regardless of overwhelming evidence, as long as there is any doubt, even if it would not normally be considered reasonable in criminal court (i.e. DNA evidence (which can be inconclusive) and a few eye-witnesses, but unsure if there could have been false identification because it was dark).

the idea of a world where cameras are everywhere adds an interesting flavor to the death penalty argument.

Think of the Charlie incedent in Paris, everyone saw that guy execute the cop, 20 years ago it would have all been witness testimony and heresay.