Clearly, you do.



Living parasitically does not mean not human. Hooked up to life support doesn't mean the person is not human.

I don't know what to say really, pretty disgusting... who says this?

This post was edited by HighschoolTurd on Oct 10 2014 07:59pm

On the subject, landmark decision.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Dudley_and_Stephens

An interesting read.

have you ever played league of legends?



This post was edited by duffman316 on Oct 10 2014 08:14pm

or any arbitrary FPS

True. I like to think I would take that path but who knows what I would actually do in that situation.

That's why it's better to just have one rule for all that benefits the greater good in my opinion. The government takes the healthy organs needed and the people who need them, get them.

It's a hard thing to deal with if it's your loved one's corpse and you have particular beliefs that mean you don't wish parts of their body to be donated but it's also a hard thing to see your loved ones waste away on a long waiting list for a new kidney/liver/heart/whatever.



and you're entitled to that opinion.



it's true. Maybe I'm just not eloquent enough to explain why I see a difference.

This post was edited by Scaly on Oct 10 2014 08:20pm

Pretty interesting, but differing details.

Dudley killed Parker to eat him.

The Andes plane crash survivors just ate people that were already dead (afaik).

Also, was there ever a criminal case/investigation into the cannibalism after the plane crash? A quick google search has been fruitless.

Indeed. At no point has anyone suggested we kill people so their organs can be given to others. Only that those already dead should have their organs harvested to help the living.

...incidents not really covered in the movie included using parts of the dead as protection from the cold including using muscle tissue for socks .

Well, if you're eating them anyway...