d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Political Picture Thread
Prev1167516761677167816795001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 53,463
Joined: Jun 5 2006
Gold: 200.83
Jan 21 2018 07:51am
Quote (dro94 @ Jan 21 2018 12:59am)
this meme would only make sense if it's referring to socialism as communism. socialism 100 years ago means something a lot different to what it means now so the conflation of those two ideologies is a fallacy.

socialism as promoted by liberals in current year is a mixed economy comprised of a largely capitalist system with some industries publicly owned such as the army, railways, energy, telecomms and steel.


semantics, how I see it is socialism = state run economy, no private property, business, etc. Communism is the stateless version of that. Some countries have more aspects of socialism than others where the government interferes more with private industry but they are capitalist if they allow private property, business, etc.

I wouldn't call your example socialism
Member
Posts: 40,833
Joined: Sep 17 2011
Gold: 0.00
Jan 21 2018 07:59am
Quote (majorblood @ 21 Jan 2018 13:51)
semantics, how I see it is socialism = state run economy, no private property, business, etc. Communism is the stateless version of that. Some countries have more aspects of socialism than others where the government interferes more with private industry but they are capitalist if they allow private property, business, etc.

I wouldn't call your example socialism


Well it's the socialism most socialists aspire to.
No private property would be awful. Everyone needs their own shit.
We just believe necessary public services shouldn't be privately owned. If our taxes pay for it then we all should own it.

This post was edited by Scaly on Jan 21 2018 08:01am
Member
Posts: 33,514
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,617.52
Jan 21 2018 08:19am
Quote (dro94 @ Jan 21 2018 04:59am)
this meme would only make sense if it's referring to socialism as communism. socialism 100 years ago means something a lot different to what it means now so the conflation of those two ideologies is a fallacy.

socialism as promoted by liberals in current year is a mixed economy comprised of a largely capitalist system with some industries publicly owned such as the army, railways, energy, telecomms and steel.



You mean... exactly how the picture describes it on the left...

:rofl:
Member
Posts: 33,580
Joined: May 9 2009
Gold: 3.33
Jan 21 2018 08:47am
Quote (majorblood @ Jan 21 2018 02:51pm)
semantics, how I see it is socialism = state run economy, no private property, business, etc. Communism is the stateless version of that. Some countries have more aspects of socialism than others where the government interferes more with private industry but they are capitalist if they allow private property, business, etc.

I wouldn't call your example socialism


That's objectively wrong though, as workers owning the means of production can be achieved with or without a government.

When 95% of people refer to socialism it's in reference to a mixed economy that is largely capitalist in nature, but with bigger govt, higher tax rates and publicly owned services. Whether that is what the word socialism means to you, others on this forum, or Karl Marx is irrelevant when attacking ideas of modern day socialists. You should be focusing on what makes up socialist policy rather than creating a false link from the varying interpretations of the word and using it as a stick to beat proponents of a capitalist system but with more state intervention.
Member
Posts: 33,514
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,617.52
Jan 21 2018 10:36am
Quote (dro94 @ Jan 21 2018 10:47am)
That's objectively wrong though, as workers owning the means of production can be achieved with or without a government.

When 95% of people refer to socialism it's in reference to a mixed economy that is largely capitalist in nature, but with bigger govt, higher tax rates and publicly owned services. Whether that is what the word socialism means to you, others on this forum, or Karl Marx is irrelevant when attacking ideas of modern day socialists. You should be focusing on what makes up socialist policy rather than creating a false link from the varying interpretations of the word and using it as a stick to beat proponents of a capitalist system but with more state intervention.


If we agree, why are you a whiny bitch?
Member
Posts: 33,580
Joined: May 9 2009
Gold: 3.33
Jan 21 2018 11:09am
Quote (EndlessSky @ Jan 21 2018 05:36pm)
If we agree, why are you a whiny bitch?


I'm sorry if I triggered you
Member
Posts: 51,928
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
Jan 21 2018 01:36pm
Member
Posts: 51,286
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,400.67
Jan 21 2018 01:45pm
Quote (Santara @ 21 Jan 2018 20:36)


^_^

tbh I think it would actually be very insightful for a lot of americans if we could magically let everything the government is paying for disappear for a couple of days. might teach the "minimal government"-folks a lesson.
Member
Posts: 8,075
Joined: Dec 28 2016
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 40%
Jan 21 2018 01:53pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 21 2018 11:45am)
^_^

tbh I think it would actually be very insightful for a lot of americans if we could magically let everything the government is paying for disappear for a couple of days. might teach the "minimal government"-folks a lesson.



4th reich in my lifetime pls
Member
Posts: 24,504
Joined: Mar 2 2008
Gold: 2,004.41
Jan 21 2018 02:00pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 21 2018 01:45pm)
^_^

tbh I think it would actually be very insightful for a lot of americans if we could magically let everything the government is paying for disappear for a couple of days. might teach the "minimal government"-folks a lesson.


give example please
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1167516761677167816795001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll