Quote (CPK002 @ Apr 26 2012 03:55pm)
1. I figured.
2. You seem to understand my approach. I rarely see such a feat. Because, as you've said, people simply take the things I say the wrong way.
3. Of course. I make sure to capitalise on my weaknesses any chance I get. I also understand that my voice is useless if it can't be received cohesively.
4. The situation of someone going towards a destination and being distracted are two elements of interest. The first element [Goal-oreinted means] is what correlates with this discussion, whilst the distraction is a seperate cup of tea. Of course distraction is going to dismantle their goal. I am not dismantled by my surroundings, and I seem to always get things done. Thus your example is irrelevant and able to be detested. Try a different example, perhaps? Not intending to be rude. Just setting common grounds.
5. The things you see are in your head, while the things I see are not in my head, but in front of our every day faces. Of course, you will not understand this, being religious and all.
6. It is like I told my father. A parent is either subjective or objective. Rarely are they both, and rarely do they use multiple layers of personality to individually approach different situations. For an example, I can be disppointed in my brother, and I can clearly show him my disappointment, but I also still talk to him and I do not shut him out. I am there, but I do not hide my impression of him, nor do I blow the situation out of proportion, because I understand the difficulties of our reality and how much hindrance is involved in human communication.
7. The ''good'' side was referencing the results from a goal. I was attempting to explain that the goal itself is the illusion and it does not have any connection with the results whatsoever. It is two entirely different happenings. Setting a goal does not have any relevance to what you receive after reaching a goal. As the results of said goal become a branched illusion from the core illusion [goal]. That ''triumph'' feeling is inside your head. It is an illusion that follows by your other illusion [proving one's self].
8. You seem to really understand where I'm coming from, and yes. It is vastly similar, if not the same illusion as that god-shaped hole. The illusion of prevailing is no different than those whom seek for a rush or a sense of life or enlightenment out of this insipid reality of ours. Mankind tends to want a more colourful rainbow, so they create their own brighter rainbows out of false perception. Generally, they make more out of the world than it actually provides for their own excessive needs.
9.. If you also recall, there have been prodigies out there who simply were just good at what they do. They enjoyed what they did. It wasn't a goal to them. It is what they did. Just as much as my passion for understanding and questioning the world I stand in.
10. The experience is false. It was created by an illusion for the goal illusion. It is not real. When reality comes back, when you finally reached the goal, you will be no different than you were before setting the goal, and before reaching the goal. It is all a psyche. Like when you play video games while you are sick. It keeps your mind off of reality, and its unbias treachery. Focusing on a goal is narrow-minded, and it only expresses that you are not strong enough to get things done without psyching yourself and sugar-coating the road ahead.
11. Let me put this as bluntly as I can, without being rude. There. Is. No. God.
12. A wise man is his own compass. A compass that is never used, or needed. For the wise man has no need for a destination or a goal. Every experience is opened in one subtle exploration with no intended ending.
13. That is not a goal, that is applying reason unto a conflicting situation. The train tracks is just as irrelevant as your example of someone being distracted by the crowd. You forget, the goal comes from the immaterial information of the mind. You are using physical examples to explain immaterial values of our mind.
14. I am on no path. There is no path. Life is what you make of it. There is absolutely no sign, no path, no road. There is no sense of direction. All I see, is a world filled with endless opportunities that all can't be lived in anyone's life time. There is no reason to pick and choose. Let life unravel itself.
15. An analytical process is still a loosely analyzed process. Science is built on the analysis of this world's already pre-existent functions. Imagine those who dare to walk on X territory. They are only second-guessing with very little to work with, a.k.a the mysteries of our body's functions. Of course they have discovered enough to be essentially accurated -- after a boat load of trial and error [as well as guinea pigs, rather you deny that or not] -- they are still using alot of vague and scarce information to structurise an element of an idea. Also, please, for the sake of this discussion, leave your vague assertions of God out of your examples. Please, and thank you.
16. I feel as though you disagree based off your religious beliefs. Which is only going to stilt this discussion. And, again. Stop with the God nonsense, because I wholeheartedly do not get dragged down by false information that I inflate with wild assertions. You also forgot what I said as well, I also said ''There ARE times where EVERY single person share a common trait though.'' In this case, every SINGLE person is going around in circles in life. Everyone is, because life is simply about circles that we try to break with illusions. The thing is, there are many who deny this.
You may have figured but I wanted to hear it from you.
Like I said Seek first to understand and then to be understood. I can then see where you went wrong in all this otherwise there will be no progress to be made.
Keep working on that then. Not many people will go deeper into investigation to see what you really mean.
So you want to only focus on the goal itself and not the parts that attribute to goals? You basically see the light at the end of the tunnel is an illusion and you would rather see everything left, right and centre. You do call that 'freelancing' as in you aren't bound by your goals. You see everything as options yet you don't want to capitalize on any of those options, you just want to leave them open forever and never go for anything. Let's now choose something at KFC whilst looking at the menu. There is a lot to choose from isn't there? Yet you would rather keep on looking at everything and never actually order anything, whilst that trip is essentially meaningless. Every other person would look at that big bucket of chicken and go for that. The thing is, they did see all of their options before hand and they decided to go for that particular one.
Last I checked we both see the same sun. I can see everything that you can see. We only interpret things differently, which is why you should listen to other people's ideas as they may bring something to your attention that you would originally never have thought of.
Once again it comes down to communication and ever-deadly, motives. You can see someone do the wrong thing and you intend to go and talk to them about what they just did. Now you can yell at them and call them worthless and scum of the Earth or you can do the same thing in the loving way. You can hold him accountable. There are many ways to communicate the same message across. If you don't like the music that somebody is listening to you can say to them "Your taste in music sucks." Or you can say "I don't like that genre of music." Christians learn to hold each other accountable yet in a loving way. Thus keeping emotionally out of the situation.
I see what is really going on here. You are only focusing on the goal itself and ignoring all the other aspects of having a goal. You have tunnel vision right now. You don't want to branch out and look at all the aspects that come from having a goal. You only want to focus on the goal oriented part of having a goal in the first place. Your goal, so to speak, is to only focus on the goal aspect part of having a goal in the first place. Consider the following animation.
O
l <-- This is GodlessDeity.
l
O
l---------------------[G]----------------------
l
G = Goal
GodlessDeity is only focusing on one aspect of having a goal and not taking into consideration the aspects that come along with having a goal. Like how an impatient person rushes through a RPG game while ignoring the story to finish the game... GodlessDeity will not be able to see the sidelines that are beyond the goal. GodlessDeity will be very narrow-minded, and their pursuit will be dull.
O
l <--This is CPK001
l
O ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPK001 is able to see more than one side of the spectrum, because there is no focusing involved, which is a grand focus on its own terms. It is like when a camera in a movie blurrs out the background to focus on a specific character. That is the exact same thing focusing on the goal aspect alone does to a person. It creats a blind side, for an illusion that is only valuable based off your personal disposition -- which is not, at all, that reliable.
So yeah we do agree on one thing at least. Is when people make goals for the motives of making a name for themselves to brag for others right? You and I both know that the glory belongs to God and only him. Is this the essential core of your argument? The motives that people have for having a goal? You should be challenging their motives instead and not having a goal in the first place.
If there were some Prodigies out there that were good at what they do, then they are only doing that one thing right? They aren't technically seeing everything the way it is. They are naturally good at what they do and are doing just that. They aren't looking for other options to leave them open and not pursue them. They made their choice and there will be goals that lie out from that.
If the experience from having a goal is false, what makes not having a goal in the first place's experience true? What is the definition of a false experience and true experience? I have never, ever heard of such a thing. Last I checked every single journey I've been on with a purpose has been real.
You may say there is no God. What I see is "I am the highest authority figure in my own life. There is no consequence for my actions when I die so I can do whatever I want and be as bad as I want to be." If you did know that there is a creator you wouldn't be thinking like that.
So if we put that wise man in the desert and he wants to find civilization or shelter, he won't use his compass? He is better off wandering the desert willy nilly and not have a plan to escape from the desert. Even though he has the tools to escape, he shall not use them right? Very logical right there isn't it?
I'll expand on that story. The Shepard is doing that
so he can win the grand prize of being a Shepard. He is in a competition and he wants to win. That is his goal. His goal from when he was young was to win the grand prize of a Shepard competition. Now his goal is within his reach!
You are driving in a car and you don't want to follow the road. You would rather drive on the side and risk running into trees or guard rails. That is essentially what you are saying. The only time I would agree that, that is the case is if you were driving a tank in the army. Even so they would choose flat terrain that the tanks can travel through. They wouldn't just travel wherever they wanted because they would get into trouble. Same principle applies to life decisions and staying on track. Not getting sidetracked when it all comes down to it.
Then what isn't considered a loosely analysed process in your mind? The way it works is just fine. You have to come up with a theory before testing it right? I honestly don't know why you care so much about studying the Earth and finding out more as opposed to accepting it for what it is. That is essentially the point of Science right? Without Science there is no technology. There is no discovery of new minerals or substances. Remember the discovery of fire or the invention of the wheel? Look at how we use both of those two ideas now. By your standards we should have never evolved from cavemen.
I feel as though you disagree based off your un-religious beliefs. Which is only going to stilt this discussion. Stop with the God being nonsense, nonsense, because I wholeheartedly do not get dragged down by false information that I inflate with wild assertions. You are only saying that everything is a cycle because you don't believe in God. Not everyone is, because life is simply NOT about circles that we try to break with illusions. The thing is, there are many who deny this.