vouch been tested

My above statement is incorrect.
But I do think we answered the questions correctly.

500 showing
33 hm, 165

665 max potential
25% pentality = 166.25


It's about as close as it gets

i know, thats why the average is still a bit lower with the hm setup.
all i wanted to proove with it is that 25%hm wont make up for the 25% loss in the acc. slot and that "This is how I thought it works" on first post is correct.

but you also dont need 60hm to compensate it like przy said...

/e:



yes

/e2:


thats because you ONLY used hm on armor, charm and wep. if you use some int instead on your armor or charm, the hm charm will be more beneficial

This post was edited by [fB] on Oct 26 2009 01:07pm

Which is exactly 33%. That means the first scenario in the original post is correct?

tom i di abunch of testing before with hm. using focused heals i didnt get a higher heal from my acc than i would in the main slot until i used a 57+ hm charm. now within cata its a lil different because of the mana diffence but in no maze before anything less than 57 straight hm on ur main slot charm was not worth the effort

this above statement is incorrect.
It wouldnt be 105% because that would go above showing heal.

I agree with you too
I once came up with a number, 62% to break even using hm from accessory.
But when doing the math, 33% is correct based on the assumption that HM is a true percentile.

OMG DOUBLE POST U SPEMMAR!

Anyway, thanks for the answers. Funny how we needed 3 pages for this.

There's no rules about double posting mr!
It's just like general chat, no rules against early bump, double post, etc.
It's not a trade forum, it's a conversation forum
But it doesn't mean be a retarded spammer either

But I think we all figured out or learned something

This post was edited by przy on Oct 26 2009 01:11pm

You need to gain more then 25% heal from your acc.charm then you would normally get. 60 isn't a fixed number, if you have low end HM-Int gear on your other equipement you'll need less on your acc.charm to offset this.

Plus lets keep in mind it's -25%/-25% in catacombs so your being more efficient as long as you have 1 hm or 1 int.

Lets just plug in some numbers for fun and see what happens

100ee - 30HM - 30 HM - 100 int = 480

480 * 0,75 = 360



-> 53 HM

200ee - 60 hm - 60 hm - 200 int = 1498

1498 * 0,75 = 1124



-> 73 HM



No?

---

Or am I still not understanding O.o

This post was edited by arxyn on Oct 26 2009 01:18pm