Quote (HotHamAndCarl @ Oct 13 2014 03:27am)
Sup raynlads
Why is it / how is it there are conflicting strength routines but both work?
For example the Texas method vs smolov Jr
One has you doing 133 working reps, the other 30.
texas method: High volume at the start of the week acts as catalyst for improved performance at the end of the week
But smolov Jr is like 'high volume high intensity 4x week or die'
Both very different, but both are known to work. What gives?
I understand Texas method is full body and smolov Jr is just for bench
In general, the key to making any significant gains and improvement is based upon duration of intensity. The greater the duration of intensity, the greater the overall gains (assuming there is adequate recovery).
These are both platform plans for which to follow. One can see tremendous gains from virtually any training regimen in which the body is consistently challenged and forced to work harder than it is comfortable with. Striving for greater victories with each training session is absolutely necessary.
At the end of the day, muscle fibers are torn, and rebuilt with recovery, leading to greater strength and size gains. HOWEVER, particular training methods can benefit various functionality. For example, GVT will improve size gains moreso than 5x5, however, 5x5 will improve strength gains more than GVT. Both are intense forms of training and cause muscle tissue to be torn and ultimately rebuilt larger, but each set of training directly impacts the body's abilities.