would it be here? i am not sure, i would be looking for a lil bit of coaching.

Chess is a flawed game because of it's deterministic nature.
That is why no one can beat stockfish.
Bobby Fisher also understood this and created a variant to fix this issue.
He called it Fisher Random.

fisher random is also deterministic. because it also have a finite version of outcomes.

There isn't a chess section, so this is the correct place to post
Probably won't get much traction though sadly, the last couple of topics died off after 3-4 pages.

Beat stockfish at 3000 and I will listen.

Also deterministic, but without the prearrangement and opening theory.

Someone should make a "live chess thread" where users can challenge each other and play over time while others watch/challenge winners/losers etc
(While posting their moves in the thread)

User1: Pawn B2 to B4
User2: Bishop C8 to F5

etc

You could just look up the definition of deterministic and learn that you are wrong.

That is still a huge upgrade.
The point is to facilitate true innovation and problem solving, not memorization.
Which is all that chess is currently.