Material Girls: Why Reality Matters for Feminism
by Kathleen StockQuote
'A clear, concise, easy-to-read account of the issues between sex, gender and feminism . . . an important book' Evening Standard
'A call for cool heads at a time of great heat and a vital reminder that revolutions don't always end well' Sunday Times
Material Girls is a timely and trenchant critique of the influential theory that we all have an inner feeling known as a gender identity, and that this feeling is more socially significant than our biological sex.
Professor Kathleen Stock surveys the philosophical ideas that led to this point, and closely interrogates each one, from De Beauvoir's statement that, 'One is not born, but rather becomes a woman' (an assertion she contends has been misinterpreted and repurposed), to Judith Butler's claim that language creates biological reality, rather than describing it. She looks at biological sex in a range of important contexts, including women-only spaces and resources, healthcare, epidemiology, political organization and data collection.
Material Girls makes a clear, humane and feminist case for our retaining the ability to discuss reality, and concludes with a positive vision for the future, in which trans rights activists and fe
Got this as an audiobook and I have to say it was a solid listen, and I really enjoyed it. Not a single part of the book was boring and it really dissected the issues that are ever-present in any conversation about gender, sex, and trans issues. From arguing that sex is binary; why sex is important; what exactly gender identity is; each chapter was juicy. I would strongly recommend someone who is interested about all this drama to pick up the book, you would not be disappointed.
Some points I find myself agreeing with in the book:
Sex is real; a person is male or female and you cannot truly change your sex so that you are the opposite sex. Any acknowledgement to changing one's sex is a legal fiction.
A woman is an adult human female, a man is an adult human male, and one's gender self-identity should not overwrite this.
Some different ideas of gender discussed in the book:
1)
Gender is innate in a human being - akin to the soul. This idea of gender asserts that it is
impossible to know of one's gender, unless asked. A good quote from the book:
Quote
"Gender identity is the gender we know ourselves to be, something no one else can feel."
Some people will refer to this idea of gender when they speak of "being born in the wrong body." Affirmation of the individual is the solution if this is the case.
Kathleen Stock refers this idea as being SRO model2)
The idea that a person who has a misaligned gender identity needs to be treated. They are suffering from gender dysphoria as a result of sex-based characteristics that they either want, or don't want. Treatment would be assisting the individual in acquiring the traits they want, often by hormonal therapy and surgery.
Kathleen Stock refers this as Medical model3)
Gender is strictly a performance, something that is
not innate. As a de-transitioner is quoted in the book,
Quote
Everyone says that gender is a social construct, but we all act like somehow it is an innate part of a person's identity.
I've listened to some lectures on feminism that have touched on this idea, especially Judith Butler's work.
Kathleen Stock refers this as Queer Theory modelWhen I've seen people talk about gender it seems like people often mishmash different aspects of different theories. There is certainly no monolith of thought in regard to gender. And people seem to suggest that gender being a 'social construct' essentially means any discussion of it is irrelevant. One trans pal of mine does consider themselves to have a medical condition that does need to be treated and they find it aggravating that people want to normalize being trans.
Another thing I want to mention is that there's always going to be a group that emphasizes 'proper' requirements to be part of the group, but on this topic there is a huge amount of people thinking different things. It is rather spicy when you have a trans person say something that contradicts the larger group's ideals, and in response that trans person becomes labelled transphobic. When I listened to the Witch Hunt JK rowling podcast series, one chapter interviewed a popular trans youtuber in which they mentioned they were bombarded with threats of violence for disagreeing with a major position of what one may call the 'trans activist' group.
This post was edited by Jupe on Jun 8 2023 06:19am