Quote (excellence @ Aug 29 2017 02:32pm)
As I've said before: I don't know what you're referring to when you say odd things like this.
We actually don't need to discuss the electoral impact of the Comey letter(s) on the 2016 election.
You are literally the only reason that subject continues to get brought up, because you seem to lack the capacity to discuss any other subject. Looks like the same goes for the randoms you went crying for help to after you stepped in it.
Quote (IceMage @ Aug 30 2017 06:35pm)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ub3RR6rKfrU
Not sure what to make of this really. If you were to just take this argument itself as a whole, it'd probably sound a lot more convincing if it wasn't coming from someone who's been trying to ingratiate themselves into the "bothsides" media on a daily basis (for example, if Jim Messina or David Plouffe were saying these words). But in a larger sense it doesn't even matter. The election was decided by one outside force and there's another complication (Russia meddling) whose impact we'll never be able to adequately measure. There are criticisms for every campaign (including the ones who end up victorious) but focusing on Clinton in the NPV/EC split of 2016 is at best glossing over the two biggest factors and at worst is ignoring them.
Quote (stimpy6298 @ Aug 30 2017 03:59pm)
criminal...post proof and not fiction
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/03/31/judge-oks-deal-25m-settlement-trump-university-lawsuits/99872174/http://www.nytimes.com/1988/04/06/business/trump-to-pay-750000-fine.html?mcubz=0What type of proof are you looking for exactly? All you need to do in most of these cases is use the keywords provided, because many of them involve restitution that Trump has paid (or will have to pay soon). Calling something "fiction" doesn't just magically make it fiction just because you just happen to not like what you're reading.