d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > If Life Were A Pop Quiz
Prev1234513Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 20,885
Joined: Aug 23 2003
Gold: 13,405.43
May 12 2012 09:17am
Quote (BardOfXiix @ May 12 2012 03:48am)
I honestly feel stupider for having read this thread.


Me too. Grammar notwithstanding.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
May 12 2012 09:37am
Quote (TrouNce @ May 12 2012 03:51am)
Which must put you below the common house cat, I feel like this response is easily the dumbest, most Ill-conceived sentence I have ever witnessed.


The OP was much much worse honestly.

Quote (Ricelol @ May 12 2012 04:04am)
I'm sorry you're unable to comprehend basic number theory.  Try taking more math classes before you spout this garbage next time. 

The nature of your analogy is completely and utterly flawed, as I have proven.  You have not defended it one bit and instead spam ad hominem attacks and pretend you're Russiabank.

I'm not moving the goal post, I'm pointing out how your goal post is in shambles.


The only letters or numbers he needs to know is U, S, and A.

This post was edited by Skinned on May 12 2012 09:41am
Member
Posts: 3,790
Joined: Dec 15 2005
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
May 12 2012 10:02am
Like moths to flame. You kids are priceless
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
May 12 2012 10:03am
Quote (TrouNce @ May 12 2012 11:02am)
Like moths to flame. You kids are priceless


Because 32728329 + 20 = 7 :)
Member
Posts: 3,790
Joined: Dec 15 2005
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
May 12 2012 11:11am
I'm actually disappointed.. PaRD's intellectual super team usually has more to offer.

I expected and received:
grammar police
rand non-contributor following the herd for e-points
hipster intellects who had my analogy before me and did it better
short sighted nerds who focus on one aspect of my post with almost rainman like precision.
the religious troll
a few failed comedic perspectives
personal attacks on my country of origin
"this thread blows" although I expect well over 10 of these.

What I didn't get yet and It makes me a sad panda:
The biblical scholar
The biblical scholar who refutes the other scholar
the convoluted ramblings about philosophy
definition debates
at least one post on Hitler
scripture
out of context analysis
flaming
post count boosters
Edit: Damn!! I forgot about meme's and quotes!

I expected so much from you PaRD, you have failed me...

This post was edited by TrouNce on May 12 2012 11:15am
Member
Posts: 15,114
Joined: Nov 18 2005
Gold: 89,176.00
May 12 2012 11:13am
Quote (Ricelol @ May 12 2012 03:57am)
We don't know, because infinity/infinity = indeterminate.  It'spossible that you could pass by only answering 7.


Actually that's not true. The number of questions for which 7 is the answer divided by the number of questions for which the answer is any other real number can be calculated as follows:
(Note that while the size of the sets can't be calculated exactly, the quotient can still be found by writing the size of the 2nd in terms of the size of the first)
For any x in R (real numbers) let R(x) denote the set of questions for which x is the answer.
Then observe that for any other real number y, R(x) = R(y) - (y-x) (ie for any question in R(y), if you alter the question by subtracting (y-x) from it, you get x as the answer instead and thus it must now be a question in R(x)) The same works in the opposite direction, so we have a 1-1 correspondence between questions in R(x) and R(y). Thus |R(x)| = |R(y)| (# of questions for which x is the answer is the same as the # of questions for which y is the answer for all real numbers x and y)
Thus it follows simply that the number of questions for which 7 is the answer divided by the number of questions for which the answer is any other real number is |R(7)| / sum(|R(x)|, x is any real number except 7) = |R(7)| / sum(|R(7)|, x is any real number except 7) = 1 / |R ~ {7}| = 0

Therefore, the number of questions for which 7 is the answer is negligible compared to the number of questions for which the answer is any other real number, and the quotient is 0.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
May 12 2012 11:15am
Quote (TrouNce @ May 12 2012 12:11pm)
I'm actually disappointed.. PaRD's intellectual super team usually has more to offer.

I expected and received:
grammar police
rand non-contributor following the herd for e-points
hipster intellects who had my analogy before me and did it better
short sighted nerds who focus on one aspect of my post with almost rainman like precision.
the religious troll
a few failed comedic perspectives
personal attacks on my country of origin
"this thread blows" although I expect well over 10 of these.

What I didn't get yet and It makes me a sad panda:
The biblical scholar
The biblical scholar who refutes the other scholar
the convoluted ramblings about philosophy
definition debates
at least one post on Hitler
scripture
out of context analysis
flaming
post count boosters

I expected so much from you PaRD, you have failed me...


It's only page 3, give it some time.

Member
Posts: 15,114
Joined: Nov 18 2005
Gold: 89,176.00
May 12 2012 11:21am
Btw I'm surprised you chose 7 to represent God.
Using 7i (or any other imaginary number) would have been much more clever.
I'm disappointed in you.
Member
Posts: 3,790
Joined: Dec 15 2005
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
May 12 2012 11:22am
Quote (taekvideo @ May 12 2012 05:21pm)
Btw I'm surprised you chose 7 to represent God.
Using 7i (or any other imaginary number) would have been much more clever.
I'm disappointed in you.


I aim to please.
Member
Posts: 3,790
Joined: Dec 15 2005
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
May 12 2012 11:37am
Quote (taekvideo @ May 12 2012 05:21pm)
Btw I'm surprised you chose 7 to represent God.
Using 7i (or any other imaginary number) would have been much more clever.
I'm disappointed in you.


I wouldn't go being too surprised, I think it was 4am here and I was hammered when I posted this.

It's clearly not the best composed idea ever, and the hope was to get a little entertainment and possibly the basis for a good discussion.

Can the answer to every question be the same?
Would a test maker create such an easy test?
Which is more rewarding, the attempt and possible failure of discovering answers, or the hope that theology answers them all?
Is there anything demonstrably wrong with assuming you know everything because of a vicarious connection with god?
Is it possible all Inquiry would cease if god were the accepted idea

This post was edited by TrouNce on May 12 2012 11:39am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1234513Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll