Quote (bogie160 @ Feb 1 2023 10:23pm)
The mainstream narrative on CNN was that this was super serious issue because nuclear secrets were involved, and that's why the FBI was involved. Now you're saying it wasn't a super serious issue, everyone does this, and if he had just tossed the government documents over the fence it wouldn't have been an issue. Who was right or wrong here?
So because the only commentary from those outside your bubble was clips from CNN, from whoever inside the bubble showed them, that represents the entirety of the public commentary on this issue?
It's important to separate political and legal peril. An executive mishandling classified documents should obviously matter politically, but it won't necessarily result in legal consequences. Here's a quote from Jim Comey's announcement about Hillary on July 5th, 2016:
Quote
In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.
Based on the evidence so far, Trump obstructed. He may even meet the "clearly intentional and willful mishandling" standard.
So, long story short, any executive who ends up with classified documents in unauthorized locations is wrong for having done so. But we live in a world where Biden's likely opponent in 2024 is a guy who did it even worse. He probably had more documents, they were probably more sensitive, and he clearly obstructed. So given the context, my outrage over Biden's scandal is tempered by Trump's. And refusing to see and acknowledge the differences here is willful ignorance.
This post was edited by IceMage on Feb 3 2023 06:14pm