hmm okay, you are a slow one ! lemme try again!

a gay couple is unhealthy, as i said like 20 times by now, because they have a lower reproduction potential (due to not having the desire to create children; note that reason doesnt matter for it to fit the definition, only the end result matters). even if it was a gay mans choice to have less children (which its not, they dont choose anything, they just arent attracted to the process of making children), the end result is that they lack the ABILITY to conceive children compared to a normal human, as they cant get it up on a woman and they cant have normal intercourse. also the thing you for whatever reason just fail to realize is this: it is not a CHOICE, it is a disability. gay people simply dont enjoy sex with a person of the opposite sex, meaning they will do it much less (and usually not at all), and consequently arent as able to have as many children as normal people due to their mental illness that prevents them from having sex with the opposite sex.

take fat people for example, they have a physical disability due to a mental one, because they have a BIGGER urge to do something compared to normal people. and its the same as being gay by the WHO definition, a mental issue that results as a physical one. that one isnt a choice either btw. people have surprisingly little choice actually when it comes to most things actually

Your assumption that lower reproductive potential = lower health is incorrect.

It's really that simple.

tell that to the WHO:

https://www.who.int/westernpacific/health-topics/reproductive-health

Your link supports my position.

A gay or trans person has the choice of if, when or how often. It explicitly states that the ability to choose is part of health, which direclty implies that choosing not to is healthy.

"Reproductive health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity, in all matters relating to the reproductive system and to its functions and processes. Reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life and that they have the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when and how often to do so."

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Oct 15 2021 02:44pm

no it doesnt. "have the capability to reproduce" means "can complete a sexual encounter with a person of different sex", which is quite hard if you cant get it up on a woman so you cant put your dick in her and thats even if you try, which you dont have desire to because ur geh

It doesn't mean that at all. We have surrogates, adoption, etc.

You're just making things up because the definitions you are linking unambiguously support my claims.

well yes, we can also cure plague now, i havent seen anyone try to declassify it as a disease

but i dont blame you at all, your point was valid as well. the "if he chooses to" does mean exactly what you said.

basically WHO fucked itself with this definition. gotta love the official sources.

This post was edited by Snyft2 on Oct 15 2021 03:02pm

Just to be clear, you're saying that homosexuality is a disease?

illness*

Okay, so being gay is an illness.

Make sure to tell that to as many people as possible. Really spread it around so people know right up front you're both a bad person and supremely dumb.