d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > What Is Left
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 77,534
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 500.00
Jun 17 2021 02:22pm
Quote (Doggyfood @ Jun 17 2021 04:12pm)
It exists in many more iterations.

There are a handful of non-profit newspapers that exist as employee-owned collectives to survive in the internet age where local newsprint is almost unsustainable.

Many smaller game studios are partnerships and collectives. There is a new trend for smaller restaurants to operate this way as well. An auto shop down the street from me is a collective. A lot of businesses can afford to operate like this when there isn’t one person making over 100k a year at a business he never shows up to.


You know i do like the sound of that but do you think everyone has the entrepreneurial spirit in them to make this work as organizations get larger? I feel like some inevitable heirarchy would break out at supposedly flat organizations as they get larger, valve comes to mind as an example
Member
Posts: 64,656
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jun 17 2021 02:34pm
Quote (duffman316 @ Jun 17 2021 03:02pm)
We do have the concepts of partnerships in consulting and law firms. Not every employee is a partner ofcourse but people can make their way up to becoming a partner of the firm at which point they buy into it. Pwc, deloitte, ey, etc. It seems like this fits your description no?


In a limited sense I suppose.

Coops have been exceptionally successful as utility companies usually offering far better service at lower cost.

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Jun 17 2021 02:34pm
Member
Posts: 3,712
Joined: Mar 15 2021
Gold: 5.00
Jun 17 2021 02:41pm
Quote (duffman316 @ Jun 17 2021 04:22pm)
You know i do like the sound of that but do you think everyone has the entrepreneurial spirit in them to make this work as organizations get larger? I feel like some inevitable heirarchy would break out at supposedly flat organizations as they get larger, valve comes to mind as an example


I can’t speak for everyone and can only offer anecdotes.
In the collective company I work for and the ones near me locally, people who do not want to vote on company decisions do not have to. There are always people who just want to make money so they can fund their private lives. The system still works when those people stay out of the decision making process.

In the country of my birth there is a very mixed perception of socialism because right-wing groups equate authoritarianism with socialism as if they were the same thing. It is important to note that authoritarianism is a form of government, while socialism is an ideology and an economic system. Socialist democracy can exist.

It is also important to note that no ideology, governmental or economic system is designed to withstand shitty people who desire power above all else. Shit will always float to the top. There will always be Woodrow Wilsons and Putins using existing systems to seize and hold power and there will always be another Castro or another Stalin to exploit revolutionary sentiment to seize power. This is a common argument that does not really hold up. Woodrow Wilson intentionally spreading Spanish Flu to Europe does not make capitalism a failure any more than Castro’s purges and famines make socialism a failure.

This post was edited by Doggyfood on Jun 17 2021 02:42pm
Member
Posts: 53,139
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Jun 17 2021 02:58pm
it’s communism/full blown socialism.

which has never actually been tried before, so says the left

Quote (thesnipa @ 17 Jun 2021 13:34)


about as close as it gets. but once these pale pasty privileged people exhaust their delusions, their boomer/older gen x parents will pass away and bestow upon their offspring inheritances. which will suddenly shift these people’s worldview faster than a bullet train
Member
Posts: 77,534
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 500.00
Jun 17 2021 02:58pm
Quote (Doggyfood @ Jun 17 2021 04:41pm)
I can’t speak for everyone and can only offer anecdotes.
In the collective company I work for and the ones near me locally, people who do not want to vote on company decisions do not have to. There are always people who just want to make money so they can fund their private lives. The system still works when those people stay out of the decision making process.

In the country of my birth there is a very mixed perception of socialism because right-wing groups equate authoritarianism with socialism as if they were the same thing. It is important to note that authoritarianism is a form of government, while socialism is an ideology and an economic system. Socialist democracy can exist.

It is also important to note that no ideology, governmental or economic system is designed to withstand shitty people who desire power above all else. Shit will always float to the top. There will always be Woodrow Wilsons and Putins using existing systems to seize and hold power and there will always be another Castro or another Stalin to exploit revolutionary sentiment to seize power. This is a common argument that does not really hold up. Woodrow Wilson intentionally spreading Spanish Flu to Europe does not make capitalism a failure any more than Castro’s purges and famines make socialism a failure.


Thanks for the insights and yes i can agree with much of that ^_^
Member
Posts: 90,626
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,489.69
Jun 17 2021 03:02pm
Quote (excellence @ Jun 17 2021 03:58pm)
it’s communism/full blown socialism.

which has never actually been tried before, so says the left



about as close as it gets. but once these pale pasty privileged people exhaust their delusions, their boomer/older gen x parents will pass away and bestow upon their offspring inheritances. which will suddenly shift these people’s worldview faster than a bullet train


the number of antifa purple hairs that end up being trust fund babies once arrested is always a surprise.
Member
Posts: 64,656
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jun 17 2021 03:03pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Jun 17 2021 04:02pm)
the number of antifa purple hairs that end up being trust fund babies once arrested is always a surprise.


The hippies were overwhelmingly trust fund kids. Normal people dont have the funds to take weeks off work
Member
Posts: 90,626
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,489.69
Jun 17 2021 03:06pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Jun 17 2021 04:03pm)
The hippies were overwhelmingly trust fund kids. Normal people dont have the funds to take weeks off work


to be fair, most of the antifa mugshots look like people who live in homeless shelters.
Member
Posts: 66,038
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Jun 17 2021 03:07pm
not sure how your guys managed to have a left like that lol
Member
Posts: 12,081
Joined: Aug 30 2007
Gold: 1,550.00
Jun 17 2021 03:19pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll