d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Trumpers Tearing Down Dc.
Prev1231232233234235346Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 38,445
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 2,955.95
Jan 19 2021 06:48pm
lol
Leftists Call For D.C. To Burn: Media And FBI Silent
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3usOwC2jEhPj/
Member
Posts: 1,203
Joined: Jan 3 2018
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Jan 19 2021 07:35pm
https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/19/politics/capitol-police-officers-speak/index.html

Firsthand accounts from law enforcent on the front lines at the Capitol. Remember though guys. Unless law enforcement shot an unarmed black guy they are a part if the deep state and can't be trusted.
Member
Posts: 38,445
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 2,955.95
Jan 19 2021 11:45pm
BHAAHAAHAA THE RUSSIANS DID IT

Clinton & Pelosi Push Putin as Mastermind Behind Capitol Hill "Riot"
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1xyhhhN6mNXJ/
Member
Posts: 51,243
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,400.67
Jan 20 2021 12:19am
Quote (Thor123422 @ 19 Jan 2021 22:54)
You are factually incorrect. You do not have to do anything illegal to be impeached or removed from office. There is a reason why the impeachment process is a political one, and not a legal proceeding, and it's because our leaders must be kept to a standard that is higher than the letter of the law.


Impeachment is a political process, which means that it has to be largely in line with public opinion to be feasible. Removing a president from office on a bipartisan basis (2/3rds vote in the Senate to convict) is a HUGE step. Theoretically, if they band together, the parties could remove the president from office for anything they want, say because his orange skin can be detected from outer space by foreign fighting satellites and he therefore is "a threat to national security" or anything completely absurd like that. In reality, there has to be evidence for a concrete and very severe wrongdoing by a president for this process to be practical. And that's exactly what Democrats and the liberal media are arguing here: that Trump pushed his followers over the edge with his inciting speech during his DC rally earlier on Jan 6... which contradicts the notion that these attacks had been planned for months.

Member
Posts: 64,656
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jan 20 2021 12:28am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 20 2021 12:19am)
Impeachment is a political process, which means that it has to be largely in line with public opinion to be feasible. Removing a president from office on a bipartisan basis (2/3rds vote in the Senate to convict) is a HUGE step. Theoretically, if they band together, the parties could remove the president from office for anything they want, say because his orange skin can be detected from outer space by foreign fighting satellites and he therefore is "a threat to national security" or anything completely absurd like that. In reality, there has to be evidence for a concrete and very severe wrongdoing by a president for this process to be practical. And that's exactly what Democrats and the liberal media are arguing here: that Trump pushed his followers over the edge with his inciting speech during his DC rally earlier on Jan 6... which contradicts the notion that these attacks had been planned for months.


You know Trump's talk about election fraud didn't begin the day of the election right?
Member
Posts: 51,243
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,400.67
Jan 20 2021 01:02am
Quote (Thor123422 @ 20 Jan 2021 07:28)
You know Trump's talk about election fraud didn't begin the day of the election right?


Since the hurdles for impeachment are so high, you need a really strong case to pull it off in practice. And the argument that "Trump poisoned the minds of his followers over a long period of time, culminating in the Jan 6 attack" is far weaker than if you can argue that "mere hours before the attack, Trump egged on his followers and told them that they have to 'be strong and stop the steal'", and that that's why they breached the Capitol.

If you argue that these attacks had been months in the planning, then the case for "Trump directly incited the violence" becomes weaker and the case for "it happened because Trump poisoned their minds over months and years" becomes stronger - but the latter is a far weaker ground for impeachment.

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Jan 20 2021 01:03am
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Sep 10 2007
Gold: 25.00
Jan 20 2021 01:13am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 20 2021 02:02am)
Since the hurdles for impeachment are so high, you need a really strong case to pull it off in practice. And the argument that "Trump poisoned the minds of his followers over a long period of time, culminating in the Jan 6 attack" is far weaker than if you can argue that "mere hours before the attack, Trump egged on his followers and told them that they have to 'be strong and stop the steal'", and that that's why they breached the Capitol.

If you argue that these attacks had been months in the planning, then the case for "Trump directly incited the violence" becomes weaker and the case for "it happened because Trump poisoned their minds over months and years" becomes stronger - but the latter is a far weaker ground for impeachment.


We don't need to go to any crazy grounds to make the case against this sniveling traitorous piece of shit.
Its literally all on record.
Months of provoking, and spreading lies, upon lies. (the context)
Personally schedules an event. At the location (reasonable assumption that thing will be carried out given proximity)
Then at the event, him and many others rile people up and make them fear for their future(the incitement)
Then tells them to go to the location.
Then while this is happening makes sure to update them that the vice president didn't do what needed to be done.

this is the easiest case ever, and its a political procedure not even a legal one.

Especially when we have multiple people who attended the event both on video or already in custody saying they're doing it / did it because the president told them to.
I hope the state of NY fucks him raw starting first thing tomorrow night.
Member
Posts: 30,160
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 20%
Jan 20 2021 01:16am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 19 Jan 2021 22:25)
Sure, but it makes a big difference for the impeachment proceedings. "On the day of the attack on the Capitol, he held a rally which directly called for violence" is probably impeachable. "His irresponsible rhetoric over a period of months caused a slow-burning radicalization among a small subset of his supporters which ultimately led to autonomously carried out attacks" most definitely isnt.


I was referring to the common argument from Democrats and liberal media journalists...


'small subset', lol. 45% of republicans support the failed coup attempt: https://today.yougov.com/topics/politics/articles-reports/2021/01/07/US-capitol-trump-poll

if you looked at his speech from earlier that day even remotely objectively, there is not much wiggle room to claim he was NOT inciting physical and violent action - something he laid the groundwork for previously, with his constant unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud.
or look at his "liberate michigan / minnesota / virginia" tweets, and his reaction to the maga kidnapping / murder plot of whitmer.

only a complete hack would pretend there's nothing he did to create that situation, that those people radicalised on their own, and that trump is not at fault. but i guess for you professional trump apologists, it's like with his obvious racism: unless he directly and explicitly says the crassest racial slur (and even then you'd probably claim he was just joking), you pretend like there's nothing there - even though everybody understands his thinly veiled incitements, his actions clearly prove it, and basically every racist supports him and understands he's like them.
Member
Posts: 38,445
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 2,955.95
Jan 20 2021 02:58am
So? Is it over? Are you Tds people going to stop screaming in the streets Burning Looting and Murdering? or is the TV going to whip you all into frenzy's committing crimes for different excuses?

Member
Posts: 38,445
Joined: Sep 5 2016
Gold: 2,955.95
Jan 20 2021 03:12am
or look at his "liberate michigan / minnesota / virginia" tweets, and his reaction to the maga kidnapping / murder plot of whitmer.

how come lefties are always false? they were anarchists.[/QUOTE]

you see that flag behind him? thats a anarchists flag

@0:34
New details emerge from plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. Whitmer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEHvQxjOAO4

This post was edited by TiStuff on Jan 20 2021 03:18am
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1231232233234235346Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll