Quote (kurisutofa @ Aug 22 2020 06:09am)
The NHTSA did a 20 year survey that showed it was safer to drive faster than it is slower to an extent. Which is why many places with higher speed limits have less accidents and deaths. The government tried to come back and say that was wrong so the state of Florida released their own surgery where they backed the NHTSA and said more accidents are caused by slower drivers here than speeders.
Quote (KoJ @ Aug 22 2020 08:58am)
Find the data to fit your opinion, got it
The data's correct, but its pointless as a flat value with no interpretation.
High speed zones are less prone to accidents by default because they're generally highways/freeways with multiple lanes, no stop signs/lights, and no intersections. you don't have people turning left against oncoming traffic and you don't have people stopping and starting consistently. it doesn't matter what speed vehicles are traveling at if everyone's going in the same direction and no one's stopping.
high speed accidents still have way higher fatality rates than low speed accidents. travelling at a high speed in a low speed area doesn't reduce accident risk at all and only increases the severity of an accident when it occurs.
chronic speeders also represent a much lower portion of the driving population. over the whole dataset they will appear to cause fewer accidents simply because they're dwarfed in number by the rest of the population. there also isn't a reliable way to quantify the portion of the population that are chronic speeders, as tickets and accidents at excessive speed are the only way to get even a hint of the value. this makes it difficult to quantify an accurate proportional value.
tl;dr KoJ is right.
This post was edited by Sonicgundam on Aug 31 2020 04:33am