Quote (Thor123422 @ Sep 13 2019 12:33pm)
I thought I had made it pretty clear before, inherent value is a nonsensical concept. There is no "value" variable we can experimentally determine in a chemistry lab. Value is something we assign to things.
However, there are things we can be reasonably confident others will value in the future and therefore they make good investments.
so the tl;dr would be "inherent value isn't real, we can only approximate, and we can approximate gold's value as very steady for the foreseeable future". i can agree with that.
but from a semantic standpoint, if inherant value isn't real, then the term should apply to the next most applicable thing. that being stable price/demand goods like gold. its kind of a "i know what u meant" situation. the demand for gold is somewhat set, the demand for enron stock changed overnight.