d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Hockey > Nhl Rule Changes
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 98,734
Joined: Nov 13 2004
Gold: 11,565.01
Jun 20 2019 02:46pm
https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-expected-to-detail-rule-changes-from-competition-committee/c-307915432


The Competition Committee also recommended:

-- A player be reasonably required to leave the ice if his helmet comes off during play.

-- The defending team not be allowed to change lines when a goalie freezes the puck on a shot from outside the red line. The attacking team would have the choice of end-zone dot for the face-off.

-- The attacking team have the choice of end-zone dot on a face-off after an icing and starting a power play.

-- The defending team not be allowed to change lines and the attacking team have the choice of end-zone dot for the face-off, if an official determines a skater on the defending team knocks off the net unintentionally.

-- All face-offs be at one of the two dots in the attacking zone when the attacking team is responsible for the puck going out of play in the attacking zone.

https://twitter.com/TSNBobMcKenzie/status/1141471696429420544
mackenzie tweeted some changes expected to see arounds video reviews


nothing is confirmed until the meeting i guess but looks like they are trying to fix video reviews at least
-- The defending team not be allowed to change lines when a goalie freezes the puck on a shot from outside the red line. The attacking team would have the choice of end-zone dot for the face-off.
that seems really weird to me idk if i like that
Member
Posts: 52,835
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 250.00
Jun 20 2019 02:49pm
they should implement that same rule for pucks over the glass in your own zone

instead of a 2min penalty, it should be treated like an icing
Member
Posts: 51,682
Joined: Jul 27 2007
Gold: 0.90
Jun 20 2019 03:24pm
Quote (696969696969696969696969696969 @ 20 Jun 2019 15:49)
they should implement that same rule for pucks over the glass in your own zone

instead of a 2min penalty, it should be treated like an icing



Agree with no change rather than penalty here

Disagree with faceoff remaining in offensive zone when attacking team knocks it out
Member
Posts: 98,734
Joined: Nov 13 2004
Gold: 11,565.01
Jun 20 2019 05:20pm
so the meeting is going on right now i guess we should see whats finalized and whatnot soon
Member
Posts: 52,835
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 250.00
Jun 20 2019 06:42pm
Quote (Meatstick @ Jun 20 2019 04:24pm)
Agree with no change rather than penalty here

Disagree with faceoff remaining in offensive zone when attacking team knocks it out


with ya on both of those
Member
Posts: 29,864
Joined: Mar 11 2010
Gold: 6,000.00
Jun 20 2019 09:43pm
More:



Expanded coaches’ challenge. Third category added: allow challenges of missed stoppages of play in offensive zone leading to a goal

— Elliotte Friedman (@FriedgeHNIC) June 21, 2019

Consequences of being wrong is automatic two-minute penalty. Second unsuccessful challenge is a double-minor.

— Elliotte Friedman (@FriedgeHNIC) June 21, 2019

Missed stoppage is only black and white calls: hand passes, puck in netting, etc. Not talking about missed penalties

— Elliotte Friedman (@FriedgeHNIC) June 21, 2019

Second change is: for major and match penalties. Ref who made call will review it, and will confirm if either major or minor. But it must be at least a minor.

— Elliotte Friedman (@FriedgeHNIC) June 21, 2019

For high-sticking, ref who called it can make sure it was not own player or wrong player. Again, official on-ice will have final call.

— Elliotte Friedman (@FriedgeHNIC) June 21, 2019
Member
Posts: 98,734
Joined: Nov 13 2004
Gold: 11,565.01
Jun 20 2019 11:10pm
Quote (StayPositive @ Jun 20 2019 11:43pm)
More:



Expanded coaches’ challenge. Third category added: allow challenges of missed stoppages of play in offensive zone leading to a goal

— Elliotte Friedman (@FriedgeHNIC) June 21, 2019

Consequences of being wrong is automatic two-minute penalty. Second unsuccessful challenge is a double-minor.

— Elliotte Friedman (@FriedgeHNIC) June 21, 2019

Missed stoppage is only black and white calls: hand passes, puck in netting, etc. Not talking about missed penalties

— Elliotte Friedman (@FriedgeHNIC) June 21, 2019

Second change is: for major and match penalties. Ref who made call will review it, and will confirm if either major or minor. But it must be at least a minor.

— Elliotte Friedman (@FriedgeHNIC) June 21, 2019

For high-sticking, ref who called it can make sure it was not own player or wrong player. Again, official on-ice will have final call.

— Elliotte Friedman (@FriedgeHNIC) June 21, 2019

all seem like good changes
Member
Posts: 63,623
Joined: Sep 27 2007
Gold: 103.00
Jun 22 2019 01:16pm
all seem like games will have more stoppages and be longer too
Member
Posts: 21,386
Joined: Jun 30 2006
Gold: 61,170.00
Jun 25 2019 01:03pm
do they have video replays for embellishcucks?
Go Back To Hockey Topic List
Add Reply New Topic New Poll