d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Debates
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 58,280
Joined: Jul 10 2006
Gold: 2,900.49
Jun 17 2019 01:40am
I saw someone recommending a one versus one debate format in a locked thread about how to make this sub-forum good again. I think I had proposed this here some years ago and thought it has potential. I would be willing to participate myself but I don't really follow the news or watch coverage or anything so the topics would have to be more vague and easily approachable.

What's your guys' opinions on it?
Member
Posts: 33,488
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,617.52
Jun 17 2019 06:02am
https://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=81065080&f=119

Its a pretty good idea. It’d force people to stay pn topic and get closure from a discussion. Its a big time commitment though, it'd be hard to keep up that kind of topic. Most people just post here on PaRD a few times during their work break.
Member
Posts: 53,420
Joined: Nov 7 2009
Gold: 2,420.00
Jun 17 2019 12:46pm
i cant believe Handcuffs is fucking DEAD
Member
Posts: 64,656
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jun 17 2019 01:15pm
I don't think it would be very interesting.

You either get two good posters and they spend all day agreeing with each other with only slight disagreements about the nuances of the topic, get one good and one shit in which case the shit one takes pot shots and tries to meme his way to a victory while saying some truly abhorrent things, or you get two shit posters and it's just a shit slinging match.
Member
Posts: 33,855
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 633.87
Jun 17 2019 01:30pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jun 17 2019 02:15pm)
I don't think it would be very interesting.

You either get two good posters and they spend all day agreeing with each other with only slight disagreements about the nuances of the topic, get one good and one shit in which case the shit one takes pot shots and tries to meme his way to a victory while saying some truly abhorrent things, or you get two shit posters and it's just a shit slinging match.


"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently."
Member
Posts: 64,656
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jun 17 2019 01:32pm
Quote (bogie160 @ Jun 17 2019 01:30pm)
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently."


Which isnt whats happening there but do feel free to try again
Member
Posts: 33,855
Joined: Jul 2 2007
Gold: 633.87
Jun 17 2019 01:36pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Jun 17 2019 02:32pm)
Which isnt whats happening there but do feel free to try again


Why would two "good" posters agree with each other on all points except nuance?
Member
Posts: 64,656
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Jun 17 2019 01:38pm
Quote (bogie160 @ Jun 17 2019 01:36pm)
Why would two "good" posters agree with each other on all points except nuance?


Because nuance is where disagreements between rational actors happens... you dont see chemists arguing over if a phenomena happens, you see arguments on things like measurements and interpretation. The "ifs" get settled in the first few minutes and isnt interesting.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Jun 17 2019 01:39pm
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,296.01
Jun 17 2019 02:40pm
Tbh after a few posts none of us are that interesting or focused enough for this to ever work in reality. As thor said not many here can get very far before jerking off their own ego or getting tired of the other person doing whatever they are doing and shutting down in one way or another

People doing this on neutral ground in the same room talking to each other not at each other is the way to go and that just doesnt exist here
Member
Posts: 6,766
Joined: Mar 21 2018
Gold: 16,320.00
Jun 17 2019 03:02pm
Quote (Jupe @ 17 Jun 2019 13:46)
i cant believe Handcuffs is fucking DEAD



Wut
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll