d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Politics Of Islam > The (real) War Machine
1239Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 10,215
Joined: Feb 27 2003
Gold: 10,565.00
Jun 1 2019 09:30pm
The United States' Constitution was formalized in 1788 shortly after achieving independence from GB.

The "religion" of Islam (henceforth to be denoted a 'state' for reasons to follow) began in the early 7th century around 620 CE. As such, the 'state' of Islam has been in existence for well over 1000 years prior to the United States being in existence.

Unfortunately the history of the rise of Islam is incredibly disputed: with Darul Islam ("House" of Islam) and historical reconstructions achieved through Western academia presenting many contradicting worldviews.

Having sifted through the history of Egypt leading to what could best be described as the "Exodus", to the mixing with the Canaanite god El, to the origins of the first five books of "Moses", to the political division (of antiquity) of Israel and Judah, to the rise of Christianity and 'state' institution of it, to the rise of Islam and the 'state' institution of it, to the history of the Qur'an and the Qur'anic Mecca, to over a thousands years of endless expansion...

...the war machine is most certainly of Judeo-Islam origin, and *not* the United States or secularist enlightenment values, including atheism. Atheism is not an ideology or even a "belief" - it is a rejection of others' "beliefs" on the basis of absolutely to reason/evidence to "believe" such.

First and foremost it is important to understand: the first victim of Islam is the "BELIEVING" Muslim. Unless this is understood, one is immediately subject to explicitly defined war strategies (which I have studied in the case of Islamic jihad warfare) which relies on inciting so-called "hatred" towards Muslims as a form of reactive social conditioning. The first victim of Islam is the "believing" Muslim for the following reasons:

i. The Qur'anic Mecca is nowhere near present-day Mecca: it was located in/at Petra (south of Jerusalem) and due to it resting beside the landmass passage that connects Egypt to the rest of the M/E, it was the center of a trade route wherein any/all "tribes" would collect at to do trading/bartering.
ii. All mosques built up until 724 CE were built facing Petra (not present-day "Mecca" as Muhammad is alleged to have lived almost 100 years earlier) because Petra was the central trade hub. The Qibla (direction to face while praying) used to denote the general "direction" that one must travel in order to reach Petra. This was to solidify the direction such that any traveler or persons born into a particular tribe would always know where Petra is. This became a "religious" practice adopted by Islam fused with pagan idol worship.
iii. The Qur'an is evolved from Christian strophic hymns that comprised a collection of "recitations" that were sang/chanted:
http://www.aramaic-dem.org/English/History/Christoph%20Luxenberg.pdf
the work of Gunter Luling also bears this out as a formal treatise:
https://books.google.ca/books/about/A_Challenge_to_Islam_for_Reformation.html?id=tqFisOXrUQ8C&redir_esc=y

Therefor we need to understand the most important/destructive element of Islam: "BELIEF".

Muslims "believe" a lot of things about Islam, the Qur'an, and Muhammad that are not true. Of principle importance is the Qur'an being the perfect, inimitable, unaltered, inerrant word of god. This designation effectively renders the Qur'an as considered superior to any/all "man-made" laws (which is a major source of fascism/supremacism on the planet while Darul Islam blames any/all else for it). In reality, the Qur'an is man-made (provably: man-handled/corrupted) as this is also even true with the Torah: it having four distinct authors J, E, P, D and a 5th R(edactor). As such the general statement "history tends to repeat itself" is preserved here: the same 'thing' happened to both the Torah (first five books of Moses, which is the basis of the entire Bible) and the Qur'an. Both texts underwent the addition of diacritical markings that changed/altered the meanings of words that suited the worldview of the editors.

Islam relies on scapegoating and projection: to blame the other side for what it is *itself* guilty of. This general mentality is traced all the way back to Canaan wherein animals/humans were imbued with the sins of a/the tribe and "sacrificed" as it was "believed" the iniquity of the tribe would pass along with the sacrifice. This is precisely what Canaanite human sacrifice is. There are many present-day examples of this attempted Canaanite human sacrifice performed even on the global stage, not the least of which is the present-day scandal in the U.S. involving Democrats (behind which Darul Islam operates, using the Democrats as the Islamic equivalent of "goyim") pinning their own crimes onto Donald Trump (target) for his obvious recognition of Islam as a "problem" rather than *the* "solution" as Muslims "BELIEVE".

As such, to understand Darul Islam is very simple: projection. What Darul Islam accuses "Jews" of, that is what Islam is doing. This is precisely why Darul Islam must generate as much "Jew" hatred as possible in non-Muslim nations: Islam are the ones generating the problems, but perpetually pinning it on "Jews", "Christians", "the West" etc. It is perpetual scapegoating and blaming, the fruits of which are people polarizing all of their own misc. hatred generally at "Jews" which is like a pathology in Islam. While it is true that Judaism suffers the same fundamental problems as Islam re: falsification of history and having people "BELIEVE" their book was "delivered" via divine revelation, there are people who are so immovably 'bound' to such beliefs that they only become angered/triggered when facing the possibility (ie. reality) that what they "believe" is not true. This is related to the problem of eating from the tree of knowledge of good and evil which would need its own thread, hence my other thread on the book of Genesis, which can be read as a secular book if not indoctrinated by a "belief"-based 'state' such as Judaism/Christianity/Islam.

Fundamentally the entire premises (which are actually a set of false "beliefs") of Islam is the Qur'an is perfect, inimitable, unaltered; all of the Jewish prophets were Muslims, including Jesus; Muhammad is the final messenger of god; the only acceptable religion is Islam "believed" to be the religion of "Adam"; and using Muhammad as a model/basis for living (including giving ones life to the cause of jihad) is the best thing a Muslim "believer" can do.

The Qur'an is mixed out-of-order in public to conceal the systematic "process" of jihad as spelled out by the life/sayings/doings of Muhammad. The Qur'an is the "user's manual" for "believing" Muslims who simply "follow" the ideology as "believers", whereas the "real" Qur'an is in-order and followed "religiously" step-by-step, again and again imitating the life of Muhammad.

In reality this religion is a humanitarian crisis: hence the need to suppress criticisms of it by Darul Islam. The entire Islamophobia industry is manufactured by Darul Islam as a Western adaption for Sharia:

i. can not criticize Islam
ii. can not criticize Qur'an
iii. can not criticize Muhammad

which is state-sanctioned fascism and what is being rolled out globally through the UN, the Media, the Social Networks, Education, Judicial etc. The entire UN Migration Compact is a global Islamic "hijra" invasion of non-Muslim nations - the refugees of which are purposely generated by Darul Islam in accordance with the long-standing goal of Islam: establish Islam as the global religion. In this way, "globalism" as Islam are inseparable.

If something politically obvious happens re: the U.S. and the attempted coup I will use this thread to illustrate what precisely is going on as Darul Islam is behind it.
Member
Posts: 17,880
Joined: Jul 15 2014
Gold: 107.77
Jun 1 2019 09:39pm
Quote (jEevion @ Jun 1 2019 10:30pm)
The United States' Constitution was formalized in 1788 shortly after achieving independence from GB.

The "religion" of Islam (henceforth to be denoted a 'state' for reasons to follow) began in the early 7th century around 620 CE. As such, the 'state' of Islam has been in existence for well over 1000 years prior to the United States being in existence.

Unfortunately the history of the rise of Islam is incredibly disputed: with Darul Islam ("House" of Islam) and historical reconstructions achieved through Western academia presenting many contradicting worldviews.

Having sifted through the history of Egypt leading to what could best be described as the "Exodus", to the mixing with the Canaanite god El, to the origins of the first five books of "Moses", to the political division (of antiquity) of Israel and Judah, to the rise of Christianity and 'state' institution of it, to the rise of Islam and the 'state' institution of it, to the history of the Qur'an and the Qur'anic Mecca, to over a thousands years of endless expansion...

...the war machine is most certainly of Judeo-Islam origin, and *not* the United States or secularist enlightenment values, including atheism. Atheism is not an ideology or even a "belief" - it is a rejection of others' "beliefs" on the basis of absolutely to reason/evidence to "believe" such.

First and foremost it is important to understand: the first victim of Islam is the "BELIEVING" Muslim. Unless this is understood, one is immediately subject to explicitly defined war strategies (which I have studied in the case of Islamic jihad warfare) which relies on inciting so-called "hatred" towards Muslims as a form of reactive social conditioning. The first victim of Islam is the "believing" Muslim for the following reasons:

i. The Qur'anic Mecca is nowhere near present-day Mecca: it was located in/at Petra (south of Jerusalem) and due to it resting beside the landmass passage that connects Egypt to the rest of the M/E, it was the center of a trade route wherein any/all "tribes" would collect at to do trading/bartering.
ii. All mosques built up until 724 CE were built facing Petra (not present-day "Mecca" as Muhammad is alleged to have lived almost 100 years earlier) because Petra was the central trade hub. The Qibla (direction to face while praying) used to denote the general "direction" that one must travel in order to reach Petra. This was to solidify the direction such that any traveler or persons born into a particular tribe would always know where Petra is. This became a "religious" practice adopted by Islam fused with pagan idol worship.
iii. The Qur'an is evolved from Christian strophic hymns that comprised a collection of "recitations" that were sang/chanted:
http://www.aramaic-dem.org/English/History/Christoph%20Luxenberg.pdf
the work of Gunter Luling also bears this out as a formal treatise:
https://books.google.ca/books/about/A_Challenge_to_Islam_for_Reformation.html?id=tqFisOXrUQ8C&redir_esc=y

Therefor we need to understand the most important/destructive element of Islam: "BELIEF".

Muslims "believe" a lot of things about Islam, the Qur'an, and Muhammad that are not true. Of principle importance is the Qur'an being the perfect, inimitable, unaltered, inerrant word of god. This designation effectively renders the Qur'an as considered superior to any/all "man-made" laws (which is a major source of fascism/supremacism on the planet while Darul Islam blames any/all else for it). In reality, the Qur'an is man-made (provably: man-handled/corrupted) as this is also even true with the Torah: it having four distinct authors J, E, P, D and a 5th R(edactor). As such the general statement "history tends to repeat itself" is preserved here: the same 'thing' happened to both the Torah (first five books of Moses, which is the basis of the entire Bible) and the Qur'an. Both texts underwent the addition of diacritical markings that changed/altered the meanings of words that suited the worldview of the editors.

Islam relies on scapegoating and projection: to blame the other side for what it is *itself* guilty of. This general mentality is traced all the way back to Canaan wherein animals/humans were imbued with the sins of a/the tribe and "sacrificed" as it was "believed" the iniquity of the tribe would pass along with the sacrifice. This is precisely what Canaanite human sacrifice is. There are many present-day examples of this attempted Canaanite human sacrifice performed even on the global stage, not the least of which is the present-day scandal in the U.S. involving Democrats (behind which Darul Islam operates, using the Democrats as the Islamic equivalent of "goyim") pinning their own crimes onto Donald Trump (target) for his obvious recognition of Islam as a "problem" rather than *the* "solution" as Muslims "BELIEVE".

As such, to understand Darul Islam is very simple: projection. What Darul Islam accuses "Jews" of, that is what Islam is doing. This is precisely why Darul Islam must generate as much "Jew" hatred as possible in non-Muslim nations: Islam are the ones generating the problems, but perpetually pinning it on "Jews", "Christians", "the West" etc. It is perpetual scapegoating and blaming, the fruits of which are people polarizing all of their own misc. hatred generally at "Jews" which is like a pathology in Islam. While it is true that Judaism suffers the same fundamental problems as Islam re: falsification of history and having people "BELIEVE" their book was "delivered" via divine revelation, there are people who are so immovably 'bound' to such beliefs that they only become angered/triggered when facing the possibility (ie. reality) that what they "believe" is not true. This is related to the problem of eating from the tree of knowledge of good and evil which would need its own thread, hence my other thread on the book of Genesis, which can be read as a secular book if not indoctrinated by a "belief"-based 'state' such as Judaism/Christianity/Islam.

Fundamentally the entire premises (which are actually a set of false "beliefs") of Islam is the Qur'an is perfect, inimitable, unaltered; all of the Jewish prophets were Muslims, including Jesus; Muhammad is the final messenger of god; the only acceptable religion is Islam "believed" to be the religion of "Adam"; and using Muhammad as a model/basis for living (including giving ones life to the cause of jihad) is the best thing a Muslim "believer" can do.

The Qur'an is mixed out-of-order in public to conceal the systematic "process" of jihad as spelled out by the life/sayings/doings of Muhammad. The Qur'an is the "user's manual" for "believing" Muslims who simply "follow" the ideology as "believers", whereas the "real" Qur'an is in-order and followed "religiously" step-by-step, again and again imitating the life of Muhammad.

In reality this religion is a humanitarian crisis: hence the need to suppress criticisms of it by Darul Islam. The entire Islamophobia industry is manufactured by Darul Islam as a Western adaption for Sharia:

i. can not criticize Islam
ii. can not criticize Qur'an
iii. can not criticize Muhammad

which is state-sanctioned fascism and what is being rolled out globally through the UN, the Media, the Social Networks, Education, Judicial etc. The entire UN Migration Compact is a global Islamic "hijra" invasion of non-Muslim nations - the refugees of which are purposely generated by Darul Islam in accordance with the long-standing goal of Islam: establish Islam as the global religion. In this way, "globalism" as Islam are inseparable.

If something politically obvious happens re: the U.S. and the attempted coup I will use this thread to illustrate what precisely is going on as Darul Islam is behind it.


Member
Posts: 21,771
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 0.00
Jun 1 2019 09:56pm
Religion is violent.
Member
Posts: 53,252
Joined: Feb 15 2006
Gold: 50,030.96
Jun 2 2019 12:40am
Everything I needed to know about Islam, I learned on 9/11.
Member
Posts: 2,808
Joined: Nov 21 2007
Gold: 0.00
Jun 2 2019 01:30am
Quote (pwb3 @ Jun 2 2019 06:40am)
Everything I needed to know about Islam, I learned on 9/11.


Well then you'd be an ignorant person. That's coming from a non-religious person who despises Islam lol.
Member
Posts: 20,223
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 5,169.82
Jun 2 2019 02:17am
Quote (pwb3 @ Jun 2 2019 08:40am)
Everything I needed to know about Islam, I learned on 9/11.


> Americans judge Muslims based on a couple of Muslims' actions.

"Well that's logical, those Muslims are all the same."

> Rest of the world judges Americans based on the opinions of the vocal (read: bigoted and uneducated) minority."

pikachu.jpg

This post was edited by Leevee on Jun 2 2019 02:17am
Member
Posts: 104,138
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,655.00
Jun 2 2019 03:21am


Yeah, as long as you're not christian, gay, trans, or like keeping your genitals un-mutilated... Islam is fine. :/
Member
Posts: 48,749
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 356.93
Jun 2 2019 03:24am
Quote (Ghot @ Jun 2 2019 08:21pm)
Yeah, as long as you're not christian, gay, trans, or like keeping your genitals un-mutilated... Islam is fine. :/


The vast majority of muslims have ZERO problem with christians.
Member
Posts: 104,138
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,655.00
Jun 2 2019 03:45am
Quote (Plaguefear @ Jun 2 2019 05:24am)
The vast majority of muslims have ZERO problem with christians.




Yeah, as long as they don't exist. LOL
Member
Posts: 48,749
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 356.93
Jun 2 2019 04:14am
Quote (Ghot @ Jun 2 2019 08:45pm)
Yeah, as long as they don't exist. LOL


You have no idea what you are talking about.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
1239Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll