Quote (Twisted @ Aug 11 2019 03:23pm)
Lol. You must've spent like an hour reading through all of these because you can't admit that you're wrong. It is EXTREMELY well-known and accepted that commas are optional when separating two simple independent clauses with a conjunction. It's only necessary when there's confusion or the possibility of a run-on sentence, which generally doesn't occur with two simple clauses. This scenario is similar to the use of the Oxford comma, where both forms of the sentence are grammatically correct whether the comma is included or not. I simply linked a source for you to reference because, as dense as you are, I figured you could do some reading to educate yourself. Apparently, I was wrong.
So, let me spell it out for you as simply as I can (and you know what, I'm going to break grammar for this part because you're right... grammar in d2jsp posts doesn't matter lololol) -
YOU. ARE. WRONG.
Go find something better to do with your time instead of trying to troll me with your elementary understanding of grammar and the English language.
I didn't read one of them. I simply know I'm right. You can read them all and see if any say anything different, and I'll shut up.
Go ahead find me sources of your widely accepted belief. Don't waste time typing. You're the one who brought sources into this.
you say "grammatically correct" another reason I can't take you seriously.