OH brother, this broad really doesn't understand math. or thinks her fans wont care enough to look skin deep into the issue.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/news/aoc-queens-amazon-hq-194301870.htmlQuote
“My opposition was less and is less about something personal with Amazon, and it’s more about the structure of the deal,” Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., told Yahoo News’ podcast “Skullduggery” on Sunday. “A lot of people say, ‘Oh, this thing pays for itself.’ First of all … I don’t know if revenue neutral is the goal that we need right now. Secondly, 25,000 jobs at $150,000 is what was promised. Does that sound realistic?”
working off memory here, but it was a 3 billion$ tax break, on an estimated 28 billion$ tax bill, with a 25 billion$ take for the govt revenue. THEN jobs on top of that.
and her response is that this is "revenue neutral"? $25 billion in your pocket is neutral?
from comments:
Quote
Ocasio-Cortez has no clue that by helping to drive Amazon away, she did not save New York $3 billion; she cost New York $27 billion. There is a difference between having bad ideas and not grasping basic facts. Forget the 25-40K workersAmazon would have employed. Gone is the trickle down construction jobs to build the headquarters, as well as thousands of jobs created by all the small businesses — restaurants, bodegas, dry cleaners, food carts, and wine bars where AOC is better suited pouring drinks — that were preparing to open or expand to serve Amazon employees. Congrats NY you elected her!
i'm sure the casual use of the phrase trickle down won't trigger anyone here lmao
This post was edited by thesnipa on Apr 16 2019 08:04am