d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > General Help > Site Suggestions >
Poll > View 50/100 Posts Per Page - Paid Option
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Retired Moderator
Posts: 4,271
Joined: Dec 29 2017
Gold: 1,239.00
Trader: Trusted
Oct 29 2018 01:40am
How to post a Site Suggestion

- A precise and clear explanation about your suggestion.
Hi, my suggestion for today is adding an option to view 50 or 100 posts per page, as possible to unlock for forum gold, similar to orb settings.

- Good arguments on why this Site Suggestion should be implemented.
In my opinion possibility of viewing 50 or 100 posts per page could be helpful while viewing large threads in trading forums.

Before posting your Site Suggestion, make sure that your idea hasn't been suggested in the past. It'd be pointless to suggest something which has been already denied.
At the beginning of year 2007, possibility of viewing 50 posts per page was disabled in order to make site working faster for all users: thread with njaguar posts
It is important to notice, that site speed improved significantly:

Quote
Disabled for the time being. Adversely affected site load TREMENDOUSLY. You can click an extra page now, it wont kill you.
No eta on when or if this will return.

Quote
It's super fast, compared to how it is normally at this time of day.

Restoring possibility of viewing 50 posts per page was suggested at the end of year 2008, getting 35 votes "yes" and 13 votes "no", it was not implemented nor denied: thread. I have not found similar discussions from years 2009-2018.

I am posting the suggestion due to statement No eta on when or if this will return and due to good result of 2008 year pool without denial. Site working slower for everyone is major downside that could be a problem even considering technology improvements over the years. That's why I decided to propose possibility of paid option, because in this case it would not be used by everyone, so that site speed could be expected to not be affected that much. Maybe experienced users will notice more downsides? In this case, please post here.

- Explanatory pictures/screenshots showing this suggestion implemented on these Forums.
Picture with exemplary cost and layout:

Member
Posts: 122,780
Joined: May 2 2009
Gold: 20,232.06
Oct 29 2018 02:14am
Hi, my vote was "no"
Member
Posts: 6,121
Joined: Mar 22 2016
Gold: 992.66
Trader: Trusted
Oct 29 2018 02:17am
Big Yes!

except for fg fg cost, im poor :(
Retired Moderator
Posts: 4,271
Joined: Dec 29 2017
Gold: 1,239.00
Trader: Trusted
Oct 29 2018 03:07am
your avatar is one of my favourites on site, so fg np;) let's see first whether the suggestion won't be denied, for now fg values are only exemplary on my picture :)
Member
Posts: 20,846
Joined: Sep 28 2005
Gold: 0.00
Nov 1 2018 10:40pm
See no point to this. 25 is enough.
Member
Posts: 2,389
Joined: Apr 5 2008
Gold: 1,500.00
Nov 2 2018 08:01am
i think 25 is enough but i also see nothing wrong with 50. 100 is too far though, 25/50 would compromise this i believe.
Member
Posts: 70,258
Joined: Dec 17 2005
Gold: 9,205.00
Nov 3 2018 12:35am
Nah.

Traders should learn to update each page's first post with leading offers instead of "bump"ing for 10 pages.
Member
Posts: 37,887
Joined: Mar 5 2012
Gold: 0.00
Nov 3 2018 02:43pm
Voted: Yes

I don't see a downside, as it is now we can choose 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25.
I do agree with some of the other comments, I think 100 would be a bit much, a maximum of 50 should be more then enough.

Edit: I don't think should be a paid feature.

This post was edited by Stories on Nov 3 2018 02:45pm
Member
Posts: 24,008
Joined: Nov 18 2008
Gold: 10,219.79
Nov 3 2018 11:12pm
This would throw the whole no more then 4 topics per user in the top 50 in the trash and would make it so you couldn't create or bump topics in forums less active. And or in forums active you would need to wait longer before it's no longer in the top.

Since some users will have it unlocked and other won't it would just turn into a mess reporting since it would be hard to sell if you have that many posts in the top 50 while looking through an extra 50-100.

Also having to scroll through an extra 50-100 pages seems rather useless when you can just click another page and view it all the same while keeping the site lag free.

Seems like an interesting idea, left my input on the matter, but voted no sorry.

Good luck, if they do allow this maybe they can work in some way to counter what I said. :)
Retired Moderator
Posts: 32,547
Joined: Sep 1 2007
Gold: 9,000.00
Trader: Trusted
Nov 4 2018 03:35pm
I would use this.
Go Back To Site Suggestions Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll