Quote (Thor123422 @ Apr 18 2018 02:10am)
Doesn't matter what you "advocate" for.
when you incorrectly represent what i advocate it certainly matters.
Quote
The system you want would make raising an actual army to defend against modern invaders impossible.
false assertion.
this idiocy of 'taxes are the only possible way' to fund a defense force is certifiably retarded.
people voluntarily agreeing to fund or join an army is definitely a possibility.
If the US government said 'we are not going to tax anyone to fund the army starting tomorrow' do you think everyone would throw up their hands and go 'oh well guess we wont have an army or any good way to defend ourselves!"?
Use your brain.
Quote
Free rider problem bro. In the end you'll have a few people who are well off enough to afford personal security (who will relocate to a stated society because it's more efficient in every way than what you advocate for) and everybody else stays in small non-advancing tribes.
unsubstantiated and unbelievable nonsense. you could attempt to claim that it would be better in some ways for some people, but to claim its more efficient in every way is beyond the pale.
we can all see the incredible inefficiencies and downsides of the state. a voluntary social order would certainly be recognized as beneficial in many ways to a lot of people.
it would not just be limited to 'farmers with rifles' as your infantile portrayal suggested.