Just check the tight end records and get back to me. I’ll be waiting. Gronk won’t last long enough to get close to Tony.

If you say so.

Already gaining on TDs, he probably won't last long enough to pass him up on yards, but if he can stay healthy for a 3-4 years, it'd be possible. Almost ahead of him on plays of 20+ yards, past him on plays of 40+ yards, and his Yards/game and ypc are far superior to Tony. On the field, Gronk is the best TE ever.

Discussion wasn't Tony v Gronk though to begin with, stop trying to deflect.

Also... kelce played one game in 2013 and had no catches at all so I’m just talking about his 4 years he’s been actually active. Don’t be a dick.

No one has said that... lmao. You may be very well correct we'll see.

You're trying too hard right now in this thread.

You said gronk was the GOAT TE and I was just trying to tell you that is super wrong.

He played a game and was in the NFL lol. That's 5 years?

Gronk only played half a season in his 4th year, and 2/3 the year before that, why should Kelce get an extra year, when Gronk doesn't? That's not how comparing stats works. We can compare first 5 if you'd like, let me know how close they are.



It's not if you realize that Gronk's on pace to eclipse every single one of Tony's records, and you're only discrediting him because you say he won't last long enough to do it lol.... From what we've seen, he's the best. You're just hoping he goes bust.

This post was edited by jadeoshbogosh on Jan 18 2018 11:59pm

Jesus Christ. Kelce playing in one game for maybe 10 plays counts as a full season? Lmfaoooo. Josh, we usually have decent discussion but are you actually serious about that?

This post was edited by ShogunExplosion on Jan 19 2018 12:03am

Are you not getting that Gronk missed nearly a full season as well during his first 4 years? Why does Kelce get a break, but Gronk doesn't? Once again, that's not how comparing stats works. Just stop if you're not capable of sticking to how things actually work, vs how you think they should work.

So, Gronk in 11 games less, put up the same yards, and double, or was it triple the TDs as Kelce? That's the argument you want to go with?

This post was edited by jadeoshbogosh on Jan 19 2018 12:04am

Games played for gronk

16, 16, 11, 7, 15.
How in the absolute fuck are any of those numbers close to kelce’s “first year” where he played ~10 plays

How many games are in a year?

5+9+1 = 15

Oh shit, I forgot that 15 games isn't close to 16, my bad.

I was just talking about the first 4 though, which was 14. But still, 14 missed games isn't even close to missing a full season. My bad man.

I don't know why I bother trying to talk to people who hate NE about anything. Hatred just clouds people's minds.

This post was edited by jadeoshbogosh on Jan 19 2018 12:07am