Hello everyone,
I tell you about work that I did independently. I did some work in the field of social sciences, which is a very unknown and controversial area of ​​science. Sheldon Cooper, this genius, says it himself: the social sciences are badly done, badly organized, and have no real use in today's society. Winston Churchill said that "the power of man has increased in all areas except himself." Albert Einstein, meanwhile, said that for peace to reign in the world, everyone had to do the job of being an active pacifist. For all these reasons, I decided to work to organize the social sciences, and I think the result is very good.
Also know that Albert Einstein and Winston Churchill are people I particularly like. There are some things I do not agree with. For example, Churchill said that about the Second World War, that "this war is an English war and its goal is the destruction of Germany".




0. Who am I ?
First of all, who am I? I am an active pacifist, and I am a pharmacist. The Nobel Prize in physics Pierre-Gilles de Gennes said that "by the extent of their knowledge, pharmacists are among the few people to be able to grasp the whole of the real world."
I'm a pretty ordinary person, but I'm French, I'm Sephardic Jew, and I like handball. My great grandfather was a pretty important rabbi in Algeria. But then there was the war, and my family migrated to France.
Also know that I am a person who does not have cold eyes: I think my work could really change many things in the world. I am convinced that if most Chinese understood the things I understand, then Chinese policy would be very different, especially in ecology. I talk a lot about China in my work, and I think my work could have a particularly strong impact in China if they were better known to people.
I said that I considered myself an ordinary person, but in fact it is not quite right. For me, there are three quite extraordinary people in the world: Judith Polgar (a Hungarian chess player), Bruce Lee (a Chinese filmmaker and fighter), and me (I will explain to you soon why I think these three people are extraordinary people).
Know that I think I have reached an advanced stage of understanding things, to the point that I sometimes see the world as a giant game of chess. I see terrorists and criminals as enemies, and I always try to stay ahead of them. This is not something I like to say in general, because it shows my way of thinking quite Manichean. I think it's not good to think in a Manichean way unless you have a deep respect for decency, and I have a deep respect for decency.
I had many friends when I was young, coming from many different cultures, and I do not think I'm racist.
Also, I have a strong love for numbers. I manipulate complex things, and in this world where huge changes occur every day, I'm happy to have this benchmark of numbers.
I think I'm a little autistic. I really like Stephen Wiltshire, and I find it really fascinating. I also like Jason Padgett, and Daniel Tammet. I consider myself a hybrid between Stephen Wiltshire (because I have a bit of the same type of memory: I record everything, without really analyzing anything) and Doctor Who (because I make very strong and very conjectures) elaborate, to the point of being really outside the real world).
One last thing: I am currently using google translate to translate what I am saying because I do not speak English very well (unlike my mother who speaks English fluently).
Another thing: I have already contacted some science magazines, but no one was really convinced by what I said. That's why I'm talking about myself in detail here.
In fact, there are other things I have to say about myself: I have a certain fascination with prime numbers. When I was in high school, I was trying to unravel the mystery of prime numbers. I know that prime numbers are related to encryption, and that's something that interests me a lot. Some say that mathematics is an area that we are almost done exploring. For me, it's totally wrong. I would love to see new methods of encrypting messages. Currently, there are only a few methods, and they are almost all based on prime numbers (which makes them potentially bad). I would love to see new methods of encryption, powerful, and easy to use. Encryption is something extremely important to me, but I do not teach you anything: the English have taken advantage of breaking the codes of the Nazis.
Also, I like USA. I like Americans because they have a particular intelligence: they manage to understand certain things that I could not have understood. They succeed in clearly distinguishing the mysteries of the secrets, for exemple. They are small things, almost details, but they are very important, and they make a big difference. Americans have many other qualities, but I'll talk about it later.
I like d2jsp, and I like the video presented in this topic: http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=72091695&f=67
I'm going to tell you one thing about God that can surprise you is that I do not like God. If God exists, if a being truly created the world as we know it, then I hope for him that he has good excuses for allowing so many atrocities to be committed. In this sense, I have a more pessimistic look than Einstein on the world. Einstein is known to have said that "God did not create evil", and that "evil is only the absence of good".
I really do not like God (though I respect him), and if God is listening to me right now, I advise him to pay attention. I advise him to be careful not to let other atrocities be committed because there will be no forgiveness.
I am a Sephardi, yet I lost some of my family during the Second World War. The cremieux decree granting French nationality to the Jews of Algeria dates from October 24, 1870. of Algerian origin were therefore French during the Second World War, and some of my family lived in France and were deported.
The Sephardim have been less affected than the Ashkenazi by the Holocaust, but still, I have a strong resentment against the Nazis. And I strongly condemn everything they did.
I also know that there was another genocide in Israel targeting the Sephardim, called "the ringworm affair", and I also condemn this genocide with firmness.
If there is one thing that defines me well, it is that I am not a casual person. I am absolutely not flippant, ever, at any time.
The US debt is something that particularly annoys me. I would like to help the US to repay their debt, if I could. I think my work can help a little bit in that direction. I think that my work can bring legitimacy to the Protestant culture, and to their particular intelligence. And I think that might perhaps convince the Chinese to lower the interest rates on the loans they give.
I am sad to have been driven out of a country that was mine once. After the destruction of the first temple in Jerusalem, some Jews migrated to North Africa, and they were the originators of the Sephardic community in North Africa. The Jewish community in North Africa dates back 200 years before Christ. And today, it no longer exists. I find it unfair that the Jews were driven out of Algeria, while there were Jews in Algeria 800 years before the birth of their prophet Muhammad.

Before I tell you about my work, there are some things you need to understand. In biology, a brain is a collection of blood vessels, nerve cells, dendritic cells, neurons, astrocytes, and so on. In the social sciences, a human brain is not at all that. In the social sciences, the human brain is, in my opinion, a sculpture on which garlands hang. Remember this notion because it is very important to me, and you will need to know that to understand my work.
It's quite simple to understand that the human brain is a sculpture: in every human being, there are things that never change. For example, some people have a strong understanding, like Albert Einstein. And it's something that does not change: all his life, Albert Einstein had a strong ability to understand things.
In the life of a human, there are certain things that change. For example, we forget the names of our classmates.

That's really a very important notion for me: remember that in the social sciences, the human brain is a sculpture on which garlands hang.

I will now begin to tell you about my work: for me, the social sciences are a big field of science (just like biology, mathematics or physics). And in this big area, I distinguish five main subdomains: (the structure of the brain, God), philosophy, politics, the study of cultures and communities, gestures and language (we can also create a domain to talk about the physiognomy).





1. God.
It is rather difficult to speak of this point. God is a strange being, whom no one can define precisely. Nobody can prove that God exists or not, and no one knows what God wants or does not want.
When I talk about God, there is one thing that comes to mind: stress. There is a stress inherent in the possibility of God's existence. Maybe God exists, and he is somewhere, and he needs us.It seems to me that there is somehow a need for the world society to seek God. Why ? Simply in the name of decency. If someone nearby is in desperate need of us, then we need help if we can.In addition, it would allow to express our curiosity. I think it's nice to let curiosity be expressed, it's nice. There is a need for comfort, there is a need for well-being, because with well-being comes fulfillment and power. And the power is something important. If we neglect power, then it is criminals who risk seizing power.

Winston Churchill used to say: "If you do that, you will double the danger." But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger. danger by half ".
I think that's very true. There is, indeed, a stress inherent in the possibility of the existence of God. And to deny the existence of this stress would be a serious mistake. If we admit the existence of this stress, then a lot of the work has been done.
I do not have much more to say than that: admit the existence of this stress, and work together to fight it.
This stress affects us all. In fiction, some authors sometimes imagine a threat that would unite us all (eg Independence Day). For me, this threat exists although it is intangible. There is a stress that affects us all, and that we could, together, fight. This stress is real, and wreaks havoc. This is partly because of this stress if murders are committed every day. Let us unite, and fight this stress as best we can. We could succeed in "meeting God". This is not a joke: God may exist.





2. The structure of the brain.
The structure of the brain is an important thing. A human brain (or even an animal brain) is a sculpture on which garlands hang. This is what makes transhumanism particularly dangerous. With transhumanism, robots may have a "brain" that is not one: they may have a brain that is carved in a very unusual way, and on which there are no garlands hung. It would be something really dangerous.

A human (or animal) brain is a sculpture on which garlands hang. The sculpture represents the nature of the person. There are only two different ways to sculpt a brain: either sculpt for performance, or sculpt to get fit.
To understand what exactly are the performance sculptures, and the adequation sculptures, we must first understand what the physical world is, and what the psychic world is:



So, what is the difference between a sculpture of adequacy, and a sculpture of performance ?
Sculpting your brain as a sculpture of adequacy will allow the person to have a particular intelligence. The person will be able to conciliate these two worlds that exist. It is this work that a mother does when she asks her child to apologize after (s)he has made a foolishness. Sculpting your brain as a performance sculpture will allow the person to have a different intelligence. The person will be able to do very impressive things, because (s)he will not have to waste time conciliating the physical and psychic worlds. That's what a chess player does, for example, when he memorizes huge amounts of information. There is a real complementarity between these two sculptures.

Carving his brain is especially important because it helps to resist the stress inherent in the possibility of God's existence. There is somehow a need to search for God, and to sculpt one's brain allows one to have the performance and fit to search for God.
This is the big defect of the Chinese in my opinion: they do not sculpt their brains well.
They do not sculpt their brains well, and they are overwhelmed by the stress of the possibility of God's existence. It seems to me that this could explain their attitude which is sometimes strange. Long after World War II, the Chinese had an unusually strong fear of the Japanese, it seems to me. It took Bruce Lee to intervene and embodies a symbol of freedom.
I think that if we helped the Chinese carve their brains, and resist the stress inherent in the possibility of the existence of God, then China would be a country much more beautiful and more pleasant to live. I only want to offer my help to the Chinese. I respect their culture, but I think there are some things that do not fit into their culture, and I'm going to help them fix those things (if they accept my help).
I said earlier that Bruce Lee is an extraordinary person, and you now know why I consider him an extraordinary person. I consider it extraordinary because it does not succumb to the stress inherent in the possibility of God's existence. Bruce Lee is one of the very few Chinese who can carve his brain, and resist the stress inherent in the possibility of God's existence.

It seems to me that Judith Polgar is departing from this rule. Judith Polgar is a girl, but it seems to me that she carved her brain like a performance sculpture, and that's admirable.

I am a boy, but I carved my brain as a sculpture of adequacy. It allows me to have a different intelligence from other boys. I have a broader intelligence, more complete than other boys.

That's why I see three extraordinary people in the world: Bruce Lee, Judith Polgar, and myself.Of course, there are other people who are extraordinary. But these three people are for me the most remarkable.





3. The study of cultures and communities.
In my work, I distinguish 8 different cultures, each cultivating an intelligence. For me, there are two types of intelligences: Eastern intelligences, which are intelligences of well-being; and Western intelligences, which are intelligences of progress.

In a caricatural way, I associated each intelligence with a culture or a country. Here, then, without any pretense, how I organized things in my works:

For me, the four progress intelligences are:
- understanding (judaism)
- assiduity, which is an intelligence in its own right (Catholicism)
- overinterpretation, which is an intelligence in its own right (Islam)
- knowledge (Protestantism)

For me, the four intelligences of well-being are as follows:
- harmony (China)
- flavor (India)
- sweetness (Russia)
- curiosity (Black Africa)

Also, I have three characteristics in Western cultures, varying according to cultures:
- the nature of the culture (people are guided by their reason, or people are guided by their emotions)
- the purpose of the culture (eople want decency to prevail, or they want team spirit to prevail)
- the scale of culture (either people have a precision approach, or they have an approximation approach).

These characteristics link or not different cultures. I have identified three types of interactions: friendship if nature is the same, an alliance if the goal is the same and soulmate links if the scale is the same.
Here is a table to illustrate all this:




Also, for me, excessive performance can be associated with fury. And, excessive adequacy may be associated with hysteria. This has particular consequences in the interactions between cultures. We can see then a "wheel of cultures". I have shown it below:




One last element is that each intelligence can be associated with a happiness (or a misfortune):
- understanding brings hope
- the assiduity brings the love (which is a happiness)
- over-interpretation brings security (which is a happiness)
- knowledge brings self-confidence (which is happiness)

I have not been very successful in identifying the characteristics of Eastern intelligences, so I will not talk about it.





4. Politics.
In this part, I will speak of only two things, which are for me the most important: capitalism, and communism.

So, according to you, as a French Sephardic Jew, am I rather a capitalist, or rather a communist?
It is also possible that I am only a socialist or a republican. The answer is ... I am rather capitalist. Why that ? I told you that I have a deep respect for decency. And for me, the best tool of those who want to reign decency is capitalism. Conversely, the best tool for those who want to reign in team spirit is communism.
For me, decency is something as important as team spirit. Team spirit is not just about uniting to be stronger. Team spirit also means respecting the other, and helping them when they need it.



As a Jew, decency is more important than team spirit because it is something that keeps my community together.
As a citizen of the world, decency and team spirit are equally important. We need both if we want a healthy peace to reign on Earth.

On the other hand, it seems to me that Russia and China are making a mistake. Communism is a tool for reigning team spirit. Team spirit is something that concerns the Catholic and Muslim cultures.In the end, I encourage Russia and China to renounce communism, because it is not a good system for them in my opinion.





5. The philosophy.
Philosophy is something very important in my opinion. For me, philosophy is "the most universal of social sciences". I have a very particular conception of philosophy, which is very different from standard approaches.
For me, philosophy is nothing more than a particular degree of precaution.

In my mind, there are two extremes to philosophy:
- on the one hand, there is Plato, who is infinitely cautious, and who spends his life lounging, and not doing much
- on the other side, there is Albert Einstein, who dares to take risks, and who dares to be audacious (a real Gryffindor).

For me, philosophy is as simple as that. And philosophy is something important. In today's world, there are still many mysteries around us. And it is important to know how to be cautious. If you have a simple way of thinking, and you are wrong with others involuntarily, then there is a risk of very serious fallout.

It's important to know how to juggle all that. It's important to know how to be bold when you have to be daring, and it's important to know how to be platonic when you have to be platonic.

For me, Albert Einstein was not wrong to have been daring. He did the right thing, and he is in no way responsible for the criminal acts of the Nazis, contrary to what the coincidence between his revolutionary works might suggest, and the rise of Nazism a few years later.





6. Language.
Language is also an important element of the social sciences. In this part, I will talk about two things: conjugation, and vowels. I will tell you about the ancient Hebrew language.



There are two ways of conjugating the verbs: either conjugate by using the times (past / present / future), or conjugate by using the aspects (accomplished / inaccomplished).

This element is an important element. As I said, Jews and Muslims have a culture related to reason (and little related to emotions). Thus, they have a certain tendency to see the passing of time as something absolute: for them everything is irrevocable.
On the other hand, Catholics and Americans have an emotional culture, they have a tendency to see the passing of time as something reversible.

This impacts on the use of one or the other of the ways to conjugate. For those who have a culture of reason, the combination of the two aspects seems the most suitable: it is the one used in Arabic, and it is the one used in ancient Hebrew.
For those who have a culture of emotions, the conjugation by the three times seems the best adapted, and it is the one they use.

The only strangeness is that in modern Hebrew, the conjugation is by the times and not by the aspects. It is something that is not necessarily positive, I let you have your own opinion.



The other important element is the alphabet. In Hebrew, vowels are rarely written. This is something I find rather disturbing. As I said in part 3, Judaism is a culture of precision and not of approximation. As a culture of precision, it would seem normal to me that all letters and all sounds are written.





7. Body language.
In my opinion, the gesture is the fifth and last subfield of social sciences. I do not have much to say about it except that it is a very complicated area and still under study.

If there is only one element to remember about this part, it is that you have to know how to trust your instinct. We can not always know everything: sometimes we just have to act, and then think. One must be careful because "act first and then think" is dangerous for oneself and for others. Such behavior is a flagrant lack of precautions, and it makes us very unpredictable. So do not abuse it.

I remember seeing a TV show that talked about a psychopath who chose his victims for their approach. He was able to identify vulnerable people only by their way of walking. It's something that's pretty well known. You can search the internet for more information. This might interest you.





Bonus.
In the bonus part, I'm going to talk about Judaism, and how to cultivate well-being in Judaism. You can apply these tips to another culture I think.

I told you I liked numbers, and here's an opportunity to prove it. We will use four numbers to learn how to cultivate well-being in Judaism:

Number 1: sweetness.
In Judaism, if you want sweetness, then you want a united community (no distinction between the different persons).

Number 2: the flavor.
In Judaism, if you want flavor, then you divide the community in two: you want to create a sub-specialization of Jewish culture, which will facilitate things. Historically, the Sephardim knew how to rub shoulders with Muslims, and the Ashkenazim knew well to rub the catholics.

Number 3: harmony.
In Judaism, if you want to cultivate harmony, then you want to divide the community into three: those who cultivate performance on one side, those who cultivate moderation on the other, and finally those who cultivate love. of life.
So, there is harmony. Like the three musketeers. Like the horn, the trombone and the trumpet in the music of Harry Potter.
Each is specialized in a particular philosophy, and so there is a large field of action: this way it's possible to grasp many situations.

Infinite number: curiosity.
In Judaism, if you want curiosity, then you divide the community into an infinity of small pieces. Thus, everyone is interested in a multitude of different things. This way it's possible to enjoy this happiness.





I hope all of this interested you. You can contact me by private message if you wish, I will try to answer you. Anyway, I wish you a good continuation.
You can contact me by e-mail at: feministboy@protonmail.com

Goodbye.

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on Jan 16 2018 08:10pm

Here are my complete works and the password:

https://anonfile.com/2dM3vedabf/Bienfaits_Accomplis.zip
a9n49y31w987qdFZ3YIJ78Pa31d97jFOPTJA13SC1321gr3p84aq3c1z897OUK54H52S1CFfe54

I talked about sometimes delicate things, trying not to offend people. So, if you read my works, please be lenient.

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on Jan 17 2018 07:29am

Here are some music playlist that I like:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4W7lnqpeBlg&list=PLco0D8liz0Cxvrsk0mJ002xL270ascOaE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-1wBk3H2LI&list=PL7Ox4aOYL5ULgsfB1R3eYUF6FzLy5aEVN

Here are drawings by Stephen Wiltshire and Jason Padgett that I like:

https://ibb.co/hVHd96
https://ibb.co/bQErU6
https://ibb.co/kKokp6


https://ibb.co/dvwkNR
https://ibb.co/cOJbU6




This post was edited by Chevaucheur on Jan 17 2018 08:12am

The book authors I like are:
- Pierre Botero, for the Ewilan saga
- J.K. Rowling, for the Harry Potter saga (the first seven books)
- Darren Shan
- Stieg Larsson
- Alexandre Dumas, for "The three musketeers".

I like the character of Lisbeth Salander, because she is a winner. For me, to be a "winner" is something very specific. For me, a winner is a person who knows how to think win / win. And Lisbeth Salander knows how to think win / win: she has friends who help her when she needs it. Too many people in this world act stupidly, and only look at their own interests. If they expanded their thinking, then they could do probably more interesting business, and it would be profitable for both parties. Personally, I am always looking for arrangements that would be beneficial to both parties. I think it's something important.

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on Jan 17 2018 08:49am

Here are some music playlist that I like:


Instrumental fantasy music:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4W7lnqpeBlg&list=PLco0D8liz0Cxvrsk0mJ002xL270ascOaE


Bass booster:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-1wBk3H2LI&list=PL7Ox4aOYL5ULgsfB1R3eYUF6FzLy5aEVN

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on Jan 17 2018 09:21am

What's in Harry Potter's music? In the music of Harry Potter, there are 3 wind instruments: horn, trumpet and trombone. The trumpet is an instrument that plays in the treble. The trombone is an instrument that plays in the bass. The horn is an instrument that plays in the average.
In the credits of Harry Potter, these three instruments play together, and they all play the same melody, neither too acute nor too bass. This gives an unusual result, which is suitable for music in the fantastic genre.

For the three musketeers, it's the same thing. There is Aramis, a very fine man, very clever when he speaks. There is the other extreme, Porthos, which is rather abrupt and rather vulgar. And there is Athos, in the mean, to harmonize the whole.

For Judaism, it's the same thing. There are some Jews who like performance, and who are quite career oriented. There are other Jews who love the adequation, and who only want to love life. And in the middle, there are those who cultivate moderation, and who harmonize the whole.


This is how, for me, the number three represents harmony.

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on Jan 17 2018 02:28pm

Here is a pot that I created if you are interested to help me make my passion my job.
If you have any ideas or queries, do not hesitate to send me a message, either by e-mail or by private message on the forum. I would be delighted to put my capacity of understanding at your service, to help you create social conciliations as best as possible.



feministboy@protonmail.com

https://www.leetchi.com/c/projets-de-feministboy

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on Jan 17 2018 06:27pm

My favorite movies are:

• Le Jouet, with Pierre Richard (a great actor)
  
• Looney Tunes back in action (in a general way, I like all the cartoons produced by the Warner Bros. company)
  
• Anastasia, a well drawn cartoon which takes place at the time of the revolutions of 1917 and in which we can see the emergence of communism in Russia
  
• The 'Burbs, a very funny movie with Tom Hanks

Other films that I like, but which are not my favorite movies:

• Nightwatchmen by Emilis Velyvis
  
• The three kingdoms by John Woo
  
• La Cité des enfants perdus by Jean-Pierre Jeunet & Marc Caro

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on Jan 17 2018 07:13pm

I'm going to talk to you about handball, and you'll see that it's a more complicated sport than it seems.

First, let's take a look at how to make a nice shot:
To make a good shot, you have to have the ball in your dominant hand (in the right hand if you're right-handed, and in the left hand if you're left-handed).
And your feet should not be aligned: the opposite foot to your dominant arm (your left foot if you have the ball in your right hand, your right foot if you have the ball in your left hand) must be positioned in front of you.

It is in this position that you will be able to make a good shot.
This is particularly obvious in a penalty shoot: in general, the left foot is on the line of seven meters, and the shooter makes a shot with his right arm. It is also valid for the vast majority of other shots.

How is an extension shot?
To make a powerful shot in extension, it is necessary to take support on the opposite foot to our dominant arm. And then, do not make a classic jump, as do those who jump in length. Then you have to hopping (it's called "cloche-pied" in French).



One must take support on the opposite foot to one's dominant arm, and to land, one must land on the foot on which he took support, or land with feet together.
This makes handball a very special sport.
Handball is one of the few sports where you can not afford to use only the right part of your body, or the left side of your body.

It is possible to use only one side of your body in the following sports: soccer, basketball, long jump, shot put, javelin throw, ping pong, tennis, and more.
But in handball, using only one side of our body is not possible because of the mechanics of shooting in extension.

In handball, you are driven to use both sides of your body, and so, to use the two hemispheres of your brain.
This makes handball a special sport.

Handball is a very nice sport, and it's glorious for France to have been several times world champion.
As a social scientist, I think that handball is a sport that deserves my interest.


PS: In my very humble opinion, Usain Bolt will not succeed to be a great soccer player, because in soccer it is necessary to shoot hard, and it is therefore necessary especially to use a half of the body.
I believe (but it's just a guess) Usain Bolt would be better off doing handball.

This post was edited by Chevaucheur on Jan 18 2018 02:02pm