Quote (Kayeto @ Aug 4 2020 02:56am)
been thinking about how BB handled this offseason
back when the JimmyG was around, the word on the grapevine was that BB wanted to get rid of Brady and transition to Jimmy, but Kraft said no. Kraft was slurping Brady harder than he was getting slurped by the masseuse himself.
Bill realized the only way to scoot Brady out the door faster was for Brady to want to leave. So Bill just loads up the defense and suffers through a season where Brady has no weapons. Brady wants to win and he knows he won't be able to do it without any weapons, so he decides that leaving is in his best interest. Voila, Bill's goals were achieved.
Now this leads us to the ultimate showdown question: Who will go on to have more success without the other: Brady or Bill? Each one wants to prove that they deserve the lion's share of the credit for the Pats dynasty. That's why Bill wanted Brady to leave asap. This gives Brady a chance to flounder elsewhere, thereby making Bill look like the true force behind the dynasty. If Brady had stayed onto the end, then his legacy would have been sealed, Bill would be he only one floundering alone.
Really dont know if thats true. The whole they want to prove who it was more. I know they are both competitors but I have never seen concrete evidence on any of them thinking like that. If anyone knows how much of team game it is, it's them.