Quote (Aranx @ Oct 10 2014 06:03am)
The first one is great
Keep it up
Thank you sir
Quote (Canadian_Man @ Oct 10 2014 01:40pm)
1st one is geared toward stock photography. The subject is the entire frame: it's a hallway of some sort. It's a photograph that would best fit in a collection. As a stand-alone shot (if you're not going for a stock photo look), it falls apart: there's no subject, so it doesn't hold up much to a single-photo critique. It is good otherwise though: it's slightly on an off-angle, which gives a bit of extra sense of motion to the leading lines of the rails. The only existent foreground is the closest bit of the rails, which helps draw the eyes toward the leading lines of the rails. Decently framed, good choice of where the borders of the photograph end.
The second photograph is bleh.
The third photograph is again closer to being a stock photo. The subject is the glasses, but the glasses are boring, they don't tell a story, they don't generate interesting thought, they aren't visually euphoric in any way... the lighting is also sub-optimal. If the shot were lit properly, it could be considered a product shot... it would be a stock-photo type of product shot. Generic glasses shot. The framing isn't necessarily bad, a little odd, a little forced, but not by a lot. Your choice of a secondary subject (the table runs leading lines and serves as a slight secondary subject to draw away the harshness of a single framed subject) works...
That's what I see anyways.
Thank you for the critique! I can definitely see what you're saying. There are some things you pointed out that I didn't even notice. I appreciate it and I'll definitely keep those in mind!