d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Hockey > Official Detroit Red Wings Fan Thread
Prev1241242243244245332Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 30,755
Joined: Jul 9 2007
Gold: 15,354.00
Oct 20 2018 09:56pm
Quote (KrWWW @ Oct 20 2018 11:54pm)
did you look at the image that Stealth posted?

He's full stride


Did you look at the rule? Is legal

What does it matter his stride? He put the jets on because the play is going towards opposing zone
Member
Posts: 42,678
Joined: Jul 8 2008
Gold: 8,000.00
Oct 20 2018 09:59pm
Quote (SicKid @ Oct 20 2018 10:56pm)
Did you look at the rule? Is legal

What does it matter his stride? He put the jets on because the play is going towards opposing zone


do you completely ignore prior responses?

I said that Stealth was explaining why the rule needs to be changed

This post was edited by KrWWW on Oct 20 2018 09:59pm
Member
Posts: 30,755
Joined: Jul 9 2007
Gold: 15,354.00
Oct 20 2018 10:00pm
Quote (KrWWW @ Oct 20 2018 11:59pm)
do you completely ignore prior responses?

I said that Stealth was explaining why the rule needs to be changed


Where do you get this?

"Touching the puck has nothing to do with it. Here's why"

It has everything to do with the play being blown dead or not, he mentions nothing of why the rule has to be changed
Member
Posts: 42,678
Joined: Jul 8 2008
Gold: 8,000.00
Oct 20 2018 10:10pm
Quote (SicKid @ Oct 20 2018 11:00pm)
Where do you get this?

"Touching the puck has nothing to do with it. Here's why"

It has everything to do with the play being blown dead or not, he mentions nothing of why the rule has to be changed


you're misreading what Stealth and I are saying

we aren't saying it isn't allowed now, we're saying the rule needs to be changed
Member
Posts: 30,755
Joined: Jul 9 2007
Gold: 15,354.00
Oct 20 2018 10:14pm
Quote (KrWWW @ Oct 21 2018 12:10am)
you're misreading what Stealth and I are saying

we aren't saying it isn't allowed now, we're saying the rule needs to be changed


Na you're speaking hypothetically, read the text word for word.

If you say it needs to be changed why didn't anyone mention this in any comment?
Member
Posts: 27,518
Joined: May 10 2009
Gold: 13,891.00
Oct 20 2018 10:46pm
The rule does not involve playing the puck.

With your logic, someone could come over the boards at any time and not get a penalty as long as they dont interfere with the play or play the puck. This is incorrect.

The rule is 5 feet. The player is considered in play as soon as both skates are on the ice.

Quote
Too Many Men on the Ice - Players may be changed at any time
during the play from the players’ bench provided that the player or
players leaving the ice shall be within five feet (5') of his players’
bench and out of the play before the change is made. Refer also to
Rule 71 – Premature Substitution. At the discretion of the on-ice
officials, should a substituting player come onto the ice before his
teammate is within the five foot (5’) limit of the players’ bench (and
therefore clearly causing his team to have too many players on the
ice), then a bench minor penalty may be assessed.

When a player is retiring from the ice surface and is within the five
foot (5’) limit of his players’ bench, and his substitute is on the ice,
then the retiring player shall be considered off the ice for the purpose
of Rule 70 – Leaving Bench.


The only debate here is if Vanek is within five feet of the bench (in which case, Twax's suggestion of a painted line isnt bad. But the league has previously ruled against adding more lines to the ice.)
I say, at the time when BOTH of Nyquist's feet hit the ice, per the rule makes him a countable player, Vanek is beyond 5 feet.

It is important to note that in the picture I took, Nyquist is already in stride meaning Vanek was further away than he currently shows in the picture when Nyquist became a countable player.

This post was edited by Stealth on Oct 20 2018 10:47pm
Member
Posts: 30,755
Joined: Jul 9 2007
Gold: 15,354.00
Oct 20 2018 11:15pm
Quote (Stealth @ Oct 21 2018 12:46am)
The rule does not involve playing the puck.

With your logic, someone could come over the boards at any time and not get a penalty as long as they dont interfere with the play or play the puck. This is incorrect.

The rule is 5 feet. The player is considered in play as soon as both skates are on the ice.



The only debate here is if Vanek is within five feet of the bench (in which case, Twax's suggestion of a painted line isnt bad. But the league has previously ruled against adding more lines to the ice.)
I say, at the time when BOTH of Nyquist's feet hit the ice, per the rule makes him a countable player, Vanek is beyond 5 feet.

It is important to note that in the picture I took, Nyquist is already in stride meaning Vanek was further away than he currently shows in the picture when Nyquist became a countable player.


As far as i knew this is how the rule worked as i said i wasn't sure, my google search did come up with as long as neither played the puck it would be legit assuming each player is within 5 feet of the bench
I'd say that first pane of glass is about 5 feet from the bench there should be a marker on the glass. The 5 ft rule is one of those never enforced rules that referee's would really start getting more hate for if they started calling them which is why i'm assuming they don't. I'll guarantee each team abuses this rule multiple times a game
Member
Posts: 22,930
Joined: Nov 2 2009
Gold: 18,391.90
Oct 21 2018 02:54am
Wow wings won a hockey game
Member
Posts: 27,868
Joined: Jul 24 2009
Gold: 726.69
Oct 21 2018 04:49pm
Quote (equable @ Oct 21 2018 03:54am)
Wow wings won a hockey game


I am can't even'ing...
Member
Posts: 22,930
Joined: Nov 2 2009
Gold: 18,391.90
Nov 10 2018 08:55pm
Wings on a roll
Go Back To Hockey Topic List
Prev1241242243244245332Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll