so to summarize, they wanted one (who wouldn't), but knew if they pushed towards one they'd get attacked. so they pushed towards 60%, intending to stay at 60%, unless an attack was imminent, at which point they'd try and get to full power.
so we attacked them, giving them the motivation to go to a full nuclear warhead. and the previous tactic of embargo, sanction, isolate. which was starting to cause internal protests in the country, is now impossible. we can never negotiate ever again with the current regime. and internal protests are basically done, we've galvanized centrists behind the regime because we just blew up shit all over the country (including schools) give the regime the best PR win in decades.
its almost like Net and Yahoo knew this would happen when he asked us to use the B2. bomb the nuke sites, claim we cant say if they're done, so we must bomb more, then invade. the B2 was a massive mistake, there was no off ramp from that point. when i stated that months ago i was called an alarmist and told this is a 3 day war, by idiots. you seem to realize its a decades long project, at best. there we agree. i just lean more towards it being not a project, but another utter failure akin to Iraq and Afghanistan. we'll get nothing, spend trillions, and wont even topple the regime.
No, it's more likely they would have pushed to weapons grade at their earliest opportunity--that is, when they thought America was too busy solving some other crisis to notice/react in time.
I think you are seriously misinformed about how close 60% enriched uranium is to weapons grade on account of you said "at other times you state they want a nuke made from far more enriched uranium"
At 60% enrichment over 95% of the work is already done. That's not an exaggeration, it's actually a lot over 95% done.
They were ready to make ten nuclear bombs the moment we let our guard down. Are you seriously here to say we should have allowed that to go on indefinitely?