d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Iran War Soon?
Prev15758596061143Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 9,106
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
Mar 12 2026 10:45am
Yeah. "Most advanced" does not imply perfection.

What's your theory, that the US purposely bombed children? I would ask you to provide some sort of logic that would justify this but I strongly suspect you are not capable of that.


The USA absolutely, purposely bombed the children. Incompetence, negligence, ignorance come before the decision.

When it comes to intent, more muddled.

Did the government intend to kill hundreds of Iranian school girls? Probably not

Did the government care to verify the Target didn't have civilians and children among them? Nope


It was with purpose because it wasn't a missile off its guidance. It was a direct hit in the core of that building

This post was edited by RedFromWinter on Mar 12 2026 10:46am
Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Mar 12 2026 10:48am
It's a special kind of sickness for jews to attempt, with futility, to blame their massacre of little girls on the victims.
Member
Posts: 17,256
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Mar 12 2026 10:50am
The USA absolutely, purposely bombed the children. Incompetence, negligence, ignorance come before the decision.

When it comes to intent, more muddled.

Did the government intend to kill hundreds of Iranian school girls? Probably not

Did the government care to verify the Target didn't have civilians and children among them? Nope


It was with purpose because it wasn't a missile off its guidance. It was a direct hit in the core of that building


Ya well you're saying both things in this post, which happen to contradict each other. If they did not intend to kill the children, that means they did not purposely bomb them.

The whole post is muddle-minded nonsense.

If what you actually mean is that we are responsible, regardless of intent, then I agree with you.
Member
Posts: 92,903
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Mar 12 2026 11:04am
Ya well you're saying both things in this post, which happen to contradict each other. If they did not intend to kill the children, that means they did not purposely bomb them.

The whole post is muddle-minded nonsense.

If what you actually mean is that we are responsible, regardless of intent, then I agree with you.


He's correct and effectively replied for me.

"i just shot into a crowd, but i didnt intend to kill anyone" is basically correct. we tried (and failed) to hit Iran so hard so fast that we'd force a surrender. so we peppered the nation with so many strikes that it was clear we'd also kill many civilians, we didn't care. we wanted to kill anything military related and didnt want to take care with what we're bombing. any low level intern in the pentagon could have briefed the president and informed him that with this strategy we'd have outcomes just like this. but when confronted with the outcome Trump instinctively lied and said it was Iran with zero evidence, just a reflex. he should have owned it, and said it was a regrettable mistake, and explained that we're absolutely hammering them and unfortunately this will result in bad outcomes. but he's a coward, so he didn't.
Member
Posts: 17,256
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Mar 12 2026 11:11am
He's correct and effectively replied for me.

"i just shot into a crowd, but i didnt intend to kill anyone" is basically correct. we tried (and failed) to hit Iran so hard so fast that we'd force a surrender. so we peppered the nation with so many strikes that it was clear we'd also kill many civilians, we didn't care. we wanted to kill anything military related and didnt want to take care with what we're bombing. any low level intern in the pentagon could have briefed the president and informed him that with this strategy we'd have outcomes just like this. but when confronted with the outcome Trump instinctively lied and said it was Iran with zero evidence, just a reflex. he should have owned it, and said it was a regrettable mistake, and explained that we're absolutely hammering them and unfortunately this will result in bad outcomes. but he's a coward, so he didn't.


Well I agree, if that's what he said that was wrong.

America is the only nation willing to take responsibility for global order. Implicit in this is that we take responsibility for the bad along with the good.

If you expect the hand on your shoulder to be connected to an angel or a god you will be disappointed. All we have to offer is humanity.

This does not suggest that the operation is not worthwhile or should be abandoned though. These thoughts are for those unwilling to take responsibility, the safe and the sheltered have this privilege.
Member
Posts: 92,903
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Mar 12 2026 11:15am
Well I agree, if that's what he said that was wrong.

America is the only nation willing to take responsibility for global order. Implicit in this is that we take responsibility for the bad along with the good.

If you expect the hand on your shoulder to be connected to an angel or a god you will be disappointed. All we have to offer is humanity.

This does not suggest that the operation is not worthwhile or should be abandoned though. These thoughts are for those unwilling to take responsibility, the safe and the sheltered have this privilege.


do you expect a joint was with Israel to result in the USA taking responsibility for the bad along with the good?

we're adopting the Israel intervention playbook, not teaching them to moderate. All of our middle eastern ventures have followed the same path, blow shit up, fail, eventually lose will, leave, deal with consequences. that is why it's not worthwhile, it's bereft of Iranian context altogether. if my house has all of the pipes leaking it's "worthwhile" to fix it, but if i dont know plumbing it's not heroic for me to try and botch it. but with Iraq context we aren't unknowing of our own ineptitude, we know full well we will fail in a regime change, we know we'll try and spend a lot, then in 5-10 years a democrat will ride the wave of distaste for the war into office, and we'll fail anyways. OR we'll blow it up and not rebuild at all, not change regimes just exhaust the regime and set them back. which will cost trillions in bombs and interceptors and cause a refugee crisis we have to absorb. its a fail anyone can see coming, anyone left thinking this ends well in any way is coping hard. all roads lead to bad outcomes.
Member
Posts: 17,031
Joined: Jan 29 2007
Gold: 6,412.07
Mar 12 2026 11:28am
We just get lies from our president ..Asked if he took responsibility for the school..He suggested Iran did it wtf? Then double taped the school themselves ...Straight up lies like always .. Like Russia blew up their own pipeline....Biden/Trump same after all... The 2 sides of America are the same stupid voting fvcks that vote in the next piece of sht,.. lol My fellow Americans is one reason i like to stay stoned. Democrats and Republicans corrupted to the core ..And there is nothing we can do about it?

We are the ones that need a regime changing ..A new something ..Do we need burn it all down before we can start fresh? Like Rome is that the only way Empire's fall??

This post was edited by doomchaser on Mar 12 2026 11:29am
Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Mar 12 2026 11:32am
We just get lies from our president ..Asked if he took responsibility for the school..He suggested Iran did it wtf? Then double taped the school themselves ...Straight up lies like always .. Like Russia blew up their own pipeline....Biden/Trump same after all... The 2 sides of America are the same stupid voting fvcks that vote in the next piece of sht,.. lol My fellow Americans is one reason i like to stay stoned. Democrats and Republicans corrupted to the core ..And there is nothing we can do about it?

We are the ones that need a regime changing ..A new something ..Do we need burn it all down before we can start fresh? Like Rome is that the only way Empire's fall??


It's alot simpler, just need to expel the jews & repossess stolen funds and assets.
Member
Posts: 9,106
Joined: May 11 2009
Gold: 5.01
Mar 12 2026 11:38am
Ya well you're saying both things in this post, which happen to contradict each other. If they did not intend to kill the children, that means they did not purposely bomb them.

The whole post is muddle-minded nonsense.

If what you actually mean is that we are responsible, regardless of intent, then I agree with you.


I can only explain the definitions and meanings of these words I can't understand them for you.

But I agree the USA is responsible and needs bear a measure of accountability. Instead of double down on incompetence narrative.
Member
Posts: 17,256
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 2,087.80
Mar 12 2026 11:39am
do you expect a joint was with Israel to result in the USA taking responsibility for the bad along with the good?

we're adopting the Israel intervention playbook, not teaching them to moderate. All of our middle eastern ventures have followed the same path, blow shit up, fail, eventually lose will, leave, deal with consequences. that is why it's not worthwhile, it's bereft of Iranian context altogether. if my house has all of the pipes leaking it's "worthwhile" to fix it, but if i dont know plumbing it's not heroic for me to try and botch it. but with Iraq context we aren't unknowing of our own ineptitude, we know full well we will fail in a regime change, we know we'll try and spend a lot, then in 5-10 years a democrat will ride the wave of distaste for the war into office, and we'll fail anyways. OR we'll blow it up and not rebuild at all, not change regimes just exhaust the regime and set them back. which will cost trillions in bombs and interceptors and cause a refugee crisis we have to absorb. its a fail anyone can see coming, anyone left thinking this ends well in any way is coping hard. all roads lead to bad outcomes.


The fact that your prediction includes a time span of 5-10 years is, I think, optimistic.

Regime change would be great. No one rational disputes that's absolutely ideal.

But the bare minimum accomplishment is setting their nuclear weapons program back years. If you think it's reasonable to leave them within weeks or months of developing nuclear weapons, you are insane.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev15758596061143Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll