for same reason games arent patched that often on xbox, like Fallout: NV, which still is just big pile of bugs on xbox

http://games.slashdot.org/story/12/02/14/203247/xbox-360-game-patching-costs-40000

Confirmed for troll.
http://kotaku.com/5884842/wait-it-costs-40000-to-patch-a-console-game

Thanks for playing. Next time post an article that doesn't alienate and take things out of context.

http://www.craveonline.com/gaming/articles/183095-it-costs-40000-to-patch-a-game



kthxbai

/e: means that if you want to patch your game e.g Fallout NV that would be the price to upload the patch on xbl

This post was edited by Zoni on Jun 20 2012 12:06pm

kthxbai lol what are you like 13?

My point is it's not just Microsoft that makes it cost that much; it's the same on the PSN.

no i'm 7 and still understand this shit better than you.

so why wouldnt microsoft do own move and lower the price? it would definitely bring more games on xbox, because of lower update cost than on ps3. more games on xbox would mean more players

why didnt you point out steam too where costs are significantly lower and definitely more players (overall)

Apparently you didn't read any of the 4(?) posts I posted because if you did you would know they have nothing to do with the conversation you are trying to convince me of.

convince you on how bad company microsoft is?

A business excelling in making money is not a "bad company"

who would have thought my arrow to the knee thread would be so popular

Been like a week and you already got almost 500 posts