Quote (Proint @ Nov 29 2016 09:51am)
Kimtribe, wasn't there a clause in your bet that stated that neither user could "lift" the banishment?
I remember talking to Phil about what it would cost to allow you to come back. Pretty sure I started that thread familia. At the end of the day though, a welch is a welch and as the keepers of the list we have to uphold the rules and not give preferential treatment to anyone. Circumstances may differ and welchers are all grouped together but that is an inherent flaw in the system, as of now.
I would pay the fee or a portion of it to get you off the welcher list. But as of now that's not in play. Nor is going from WPB to unknown (as far as I know, correct me if I'm wrong Sheriff). Hopefully these things change.
If we are getting so technical about betting clauses how come DM and Phils went under the radar?
Oh that's right, because sheriff said he isn't touching LTF bets with a 10 foot pole. But ofc that's changed now, just like the system of rules around the bettors list every time their is one argument rofl