d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearing Week
Prev12425262728443Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Sep 13 2018 05:16pm
Quote (krackprophet @ Sep 13 2018 07:12pm)
rip - vote delayed.

[URL=https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/13/politics/kavanaugh-nomination-judiciary-committee/index.html]https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/13/politics/kavanaugh-nomination-judiciary-committee/index.html[/URL]


Good, it should be delayed until 2020 or when trump resigns which ever comes first.
Member
Posts: 104,574
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Sep 13 2018 05:35pm
It's not delayed. LOL It's was SET today to be Sept. 20th. No delay at all.
If CNN was at all honest they would report things correctly.



/e






/ee



...and do just what the Dems want....stall till after the Nov elections? Stall to allow these ridiculous cases brought by lower court judges to mire the govt. in BS? No we sjhouldn't.


Dianne Feinstein... and the Dems BS

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/13/us/politics/brett-kavanaugh-dianne-feinstein.html


Quote
The information came in a letter, dated July 30, which was first sent to the office of Representative Anna Eshoo, Democrat of California, and accuses the judge of sexual misconduct toward the letter’s author, a person familiar with the letter confirmed.




Quote
Ms. Feinstein, who received the letter from Ms. Eshoo’s office, informed fellow Democrats on the Judiciary Committee about its existence and its contents on Wednesday evening but did not share the letter itself. Several Democrats advised her to take its claims to the F.B.I., and others pressed for it to become public.

In addition to criminal investigations, the F.B.I. conducts background checks on all major government appointees, including Supreme Court nominees. The F.B.I. said in a statement on Thursday that it had received Ms. Feinstein’s referral and included it in Judge Kavanaugh’s background file. A bureau official also said that no criminal investigation had been opened related to the matter.




Quote
The White House responded almost immediately.

“Throughout his confirmation process, Judge Kavanaugh has had 65 meetings with senators — including with Senator Feinstein — sat through over 30 hours of testimony, addressed over 2,000 questions in a public setting and additional questions in a confidential session. Not until the eve of his confirmation has Senator Feinstein or anyone raised the specter of new ‘information’ about him,” said White House spokeswoman Kerri Kupec. She added, “Senator Schumer promised to ‘oppose Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination with everything I have,’ and it appears he is delivering with this 11th hour attempt to delay his confirmation.”




Quote
Ms. Feinstein had not shared the letter with Mr. Grassley, who said that nonetheless it would not affect his timeline.


Quote
“Senator Grassley is aware of Senator Feinstein’s referral,” said George Hartmann, a spokesman for Mr. Grassley. “At this time, he has not seen the letter in question, and is respecting the request for confidentiality. There’s no plan to change the committee’s consideration of Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination.”

Carrie Severino, chief counsel and policy director of the Judicial Crisis Network, the conservative group pressing for Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation, condemned Ms. Feinstein’s action: “This has all the indicators of an 11th hour character assassination and a desperate attempt to delay and defeat the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh, who has a sterling reputation in his community, his profession, his church and among hundreds of friends, colleagues and co-workers.”





How do you folks sleep at night, defending BS behavior like this from Senator Dianne Feinstein?

I'm glad I don't have to exist in your shoes.

This post was edited by Ghot on Sep 13 2018 05:40pm
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Sep 13 2018 05:40pm
Quote (Ghot @ Sep 13 2018 07:35pm)
It's not delayed. LOL It's was SET today to be Sept. 20th. No delay at all.
If CNN was at all honest they would report things correctly.


Just about every major news outlet is using the word "delayed" in their reporting about the vote... what are the chances they're all wrong and you're right?
Member
Posts: 104,574
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Sep 13 2018 05:42pm
Quote (Horford @ Sep 13 2018 07:40pm)
Just about every major news outlet is using the word "delayed" in their reporting about the vote... what are the chances they're all wrong and you're right?




100%


The hearing only concluded last Friday. LOL

This post was edited by Ghot on Sep 13 2018 05:43pm
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Sep 13 2018 05:49pm
Quote (Ghot @ Sep 13 2018 07:42pm)
100%


The hearing only concluded last Friday. LOL


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/senate-committee-delays-vote-on-kavanaugh-nomination-until-next-week/2018/09/13/726bdb7e-b758-11e8-b79f-f6e31e555258_story.html

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/brett-kavanagh-vote-delayed_us_5b99e3f8e4b015089c0d35ed


https://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/kavanaugh-vote-delayed

More shameful #fake news media collusion, sad!
Member
Posts: 104,574
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,485.00
Sep 13 2018 05:50pm







hA-Ha-HA-ha-Ha-HA !!!
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 285.00
Sep 13 2018 05:54pm
Any real reason to oppose this guy? He seems like a legitimate pick. Moderately conservative justice to replace a moderately conservative justice that was often the only voice of sanity an increasingly partisan bench.
Member
Posts: 33,652
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,617.52
Sep 13 2018 05:57pm
Quote (Horford @ Sep 13 2018 07:40pm)
Just about every major news outlet is using the word "delayed" in their reporting about the vote... what are the chances they're all wrong and you're right?


Same chances as hillary winning
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,296.75
Sep 13 2018 06:00pm
Quote (Skinned @ Sep 13 2018 04:54pm)
Any real reason to oppose this guy? He seems like a legitimate pick. Moderately conservative justice to replace a moderately conservative justice that was often the only voice of sanity an increasingly partisan bench.


I haven't opposed him he was my pick on the list that he was on before he was chosen

typical republican pick and good for Trump because he's a serious person.

something about a metoo type situation today that I dunno the full deets on yet

he had perjury talk drama the other day

as of right now I haven't seen enough to change my worthless vote to pass him through but gotta see where today's thing ends up
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Sep 13 2018 06:04pm
Quote (Skinned @ Sep 13 2018 07:54pm)
Any real reason to oppose this guy? He seems like a legitimate pick. Moderately conservative justice to replace a moderately conservative justice that was often the only voice of sanity an increasingly partisan bench.


Oh gee, no reason, just a few counts of comitting perjury, a possible #metoo, oh and he was nominated by a Russian asset. Let's get him in there asap, he'll only be on the court for 20+ years, no biggie.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12425262728443Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll