Quote (TiStuff @ 20 Dec 2020 21:49)
there is no scientific data that masks prevent the spread of covid. In fact the data shows covid is higher where masks are required. Its puzzeling perhaps but that is what the data is.
corona is so small it passes right through a mask and at the same time it accumulates plenty of other bad things. The insanity and it looks like everything from the lefties is bad.
as much as we are arguing about it, there is a reason why stores open to the public dont make arbitrary rules
This is false in so many ways.
Scientific fact: If you are sick with a contagion that is spread via bodily fluid, then wearing a mask will reduce the risk of your random sneeze, cough, or speech spreading your bodily fluids to another person. It does not completely remove the risk that you will spread the contagion, it's called a "risk mitigation". The irony is that gloves are equally as important, if not more so, and nobody seems to be mandating those. Though many employers are requiring employees to wear gloves.
And correlation does not equal causation. Mask usage isn't the reason for areas having a higher rate of spread. Areas have the higher rate of spread, and mandate masks.
As to whether or not Covid will go through a mask, that is true to an extent, but limited. The basic thought is that once they acknowledged that covid is indeed airborne, and aerosolizes, you need to limit the amount of "free floating covid". Covid survives in aerosolized form for approximately 3 hours. So if you're wearing a mask and that mask catches 65% of the virus, preventing it from being "free floating" then that's 65% less chance you're going to infect someone else. Are mandates good based on 65% limitation? I'd tend to think not so much. But to claim masks have no impact at all is to deny science.